MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404194958 · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2024-108720

Snow sports-specific extension of the IOC consensus statement: methods for recording and reporting epidemiological data on injury and illness in sports

2024· article· en· W4404194958 on OpenAlexaff
Jörg Spörri, Kerry McGawley, Marine Alhammoud, Roald Bahr, Caitlin Dios, Lars Engebretsen, Matthias Gilgien, Vincent Gouttebarge, Helen Hanstock, Lars Haugvad, Hubert Hörterer, Tom Kastner, Gerald Mitterbauer, Margo Mountjoy, Dionne A. Noordhof, Gerhard Ruedl, Johannes Scherr, Wolfgang Schobersberger, Torbjørn Soligard, Lisa Steidl-Müller, Oleane Marthea Rebne Stenseth, Astrid Uhrenholdt Jacobsen, Maarit Valtonen, Maria Westin, Benjamin Clarsen, Evert Verhagen

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Sports Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWinter Sports Injuries and Performance
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatement (logic)MedicineEpidemiologyHeat illnessSports medicineSports injuryPhysical therapyPathologyGeographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The International Olympic Committee's (IOC) consensus statement on 'methods for recording and reporting of epidemiological data on injury and illness in sport' recommended standardising methods to advance data collection and reporting consistency. However, additional aspects need to be considered when these methods are applied to specific sports settings. Therefore, we have developed a snow sports-specific extension of the IOC statement to promote the harmonisation of injury and illness registration methods among athletes of all levels and categories in the different disciplines governed by the International Ski and Snowboard Federation (FIS), which is also applicable to other related snow sports such as biathlon, ski mountaineering, and to some extent, para snow sports. The panel was selected with the aim of representing as many different areas of expertise/backgrounds, perspectives and diversity as possible, and all members were assigned to thematic subgroups based on their profiles. After panel formation, all members were provided with an initial draft of this extension, which was used as a basis for discussion of aspects specific to the discipline, application context, level and sex within their snow sports subgroup topic. The outcomes were then aligned with the IOC's existing consensus recommendations and incorporated into a preliminary manuscript draft. The final version of this snow sports-specific extension was developed and approved in two iterative rounds of manuscript revisions by all consensus panel members and a final meeting to clarify open discussion points. This snow sports-specific extension of the IOC statement is intended to guide researchers, international and national sports governing bodies, and other entities recording and reporting epidemiological data in snow sports to help standardise data from different sources for comparison and future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.503
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.535
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.5030.535
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.007
Bibliometrics0.0200.014
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0090.019
Research integrity0.0080.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Sports MedicineSame topicWinter Sports Injuries and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207