Assembly and characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of the Colombian coffee varieties Caturra Chiroso, Bourbon Chiroso and Chiroso, Coffea arabica L. (Rubiaceae), with insights on their phylogenetic relationships
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Varieties represent a defined group with differentiated characteristics derived through natural selection and/or selective breeding from within a species. In the Central-Andean region of Colombia (Urrao) there are three endemic varieties of the species Coffea arabica L [“Caturra Chiroso” (CCH), “Bourbon Chiroso” (BCH), and “Chiroso” (CHCH)], known as “Chiroso” group, globally renowned for their high quality and distinctive cup profile. Despite its significance, there is a lack of reported genomic resources or basic biological information for these. In this study, we conducted the first assembly and characterization of the complete chloroplast (Cp) genomes of these varieties and reconstructed their ancestry relationships. The Cp genomes were 155,188 bp in length (A = 30.93%; C = 19.06%; G = 18.37%; T = 31.64%); containing 131 genes, comprising 86 protein-coding genes, 8 rRNA genes, and 37 tRNA genes. They consisted of four subregions: the large single-copy (LSC) region (85,159 bp; 83 genes), the short single-copy (SSC) region (18,136 bp; 12 genes), and the inverted repeats IRA (25,944 bp; 18 genes) and IRB (25,945 bp; 18 genes). Likewise, among 26 intraspecific varieties analyzed, CCH + BCH formed a unique haplotype, and CHCH + Bourbon + Caturra formed another. CCH and BCH featured an exclusive Cytosine mutation (SNP: C/A), position 47,413 bp (intergenic spacer region trnT(UGU)-trnL(UAA)]. Likewise, a total of 445 short tandem repeats were found in the Cp genomes (dinucleotides: 370; trinucleotides: 71; tetranucleotides: 1). Finally, the three formed a well-supported monophyletic group with conspecific varieties, being more closely related to Eastern Ethiopian-origin varieties [e.g. Berbere region], as well as with traditional ones like Typica, Bourbon, and Caturra. These coffee varieties are a valuable new genetic resource for use as a gene source for genetic improvement, biotechnology, direct exploitation and cultivation worldwide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".