MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404208861 · doi:10.5812/numonthly-146899

Predictors of Post-operative ABG Changes to Pre-operative Levels in Kidney Transplant Patients, a Cross-Sectional Study

2024· article· en· W4404208861 on OpenAlexaff
Morteza Hashemian, Mohammad Reza Ebadzadeh, Reza Mohammadi, Mahboubeh Mirzaei, Majid Abdoli, Seyed Amir Mohajerani

Bibliographic record

VenueNephro-Urology Monthly · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal function and acid-base balance
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCross-sectional studyMedicineKidney transplantSurgeryInternal medicineKidneyKidney transplantationPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Kidney transplant is the treatment of choice for chronic renal failure (CRF), significantly improving patient outcomes. Fluid administration during surgery can lead to the accumulation of acid ions and electrolytes, inducing pH changes from the pre-operative to post-operative period, which may compromise transplant success. The impact of acid-base balance changes on transplant outcomes is crucial, yet research on predictors and arterial blood gas (ABG) changes post-kidney transplant is limited. Understanding ABG changes can enhance perioperative management, early detection of complications, and long-term graft function, thereby optimizing patient care and increasing transplant success rates. Objectives: To assess ABG changes before and after kidney transplant and identify predictors of post-operative acidosis in patients with renal failure through cross-sectional studies. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, we included 97 patients who had undergone kidney transplant. During surgery, patients received crystalloid fluids, with 49 receiving only normal saline and 48 receiving only Ringer's lactate. Data collection involved the insertion of an arterial line after anesthesia induction, and the first ABG sample was obtained as a pre-operative measure. A post-operative measure was taken at the end of the surgery. Ethical considerations were followed throughout the study. Statistical analysis included paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare pre- and post-operative ABG measures, with a significance level set at a P-value less than 0.05. Results: Total of 97 patients, which 65 (69.4%) were male and 32 (30.6%) were female and mean age was 38.6 ± 12.2. Variables significantly associated with post-op acidosis were fluid administered (OR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.45 - 4.58), post-op central venous pressure (CVP) (OR: 2.31, 95% CI: 1.23 - 2.62, p < 0.05), post-op base excess (BE) (OR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.50 - 2.95, P < 0.05). HCO₃ (P = 0.010), BE (P = 0.002), pH (P = 0.023) were significantly lower in the normal saline group compared to the Ringer's group. Post-op pH and BE was also associated with increased post-op CVP. Post-op acidosis and post-op CVP were significantly associated with post-op BE. Conclusions: Post-operative ABG changes, including decreases in pH and HCO3, are key indicators of transplant outcomes, reflecting graft function and patient stability. These findings highlight the critical need for prompt management of ABG abnormalities to optimize transplant success and minimize complications, making vigilant monitoring a vital part of post-transplant care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephro-Urology MonthlySame topicRenal function and acid-base balanceFrench-language works237,207