Is intercalary frozen autograft augmented with intramedullary cement and bridging plates fixation a durable reconstruction?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: We analysed the survival, complications, and function of frozen autograft augmented with intramedullary cement and bridging plates fixation for intercalary bone defect reconstruction in primary bone sarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 72 patients with primary bone sarcomas (34 males, 38 females) between January 2016 and June 2023. The average age was 22.0 ± 13.6 years (6 to 61 years) and the pathological type included osteosarcoma (55), followed by adamantinoma (5), Ewing's sarcoma (4), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (4), chondrosarcoma (3), and malignant tenosynovial giant cell tumor (1). The oncological outcomes included local control, metastasis, progression-free survival and overall survival. The functional outcomes were evaluated by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS-93), the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), and the motion of the joint. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 50.0 ± 27.4 months (12 to 99 months). 10 patients died of the disease, 9 patients were alive with disease and 53 patients were alive with no evidence of disease. The average 5-year overall survival of autograft was 85.8% (95% CI, 72.1-93.1%). The average MSTS-93 score was 96% ( 67-100%) and the average TESS score was 98% (74-100%). Twenty-four patients (33.3%) had at least one complication in the follow-up period. The most common complications were nonunion (9.7%, 7/72) and local recurrence (9.7%, 7/72), followed by leg length discrepancy (6.9%, 5/72), infection (5.6%, 4/72), implant failure (4.2%, 3/72), delayed union (2.8%, 2/72), and graft fractures (1.4%, 1/72). Tumor site was an independent risk factor for bone nonunion (OR, 22.23; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: We presented a large technique series for preventing autograft-related complications (especially for autograft fractures) of intercalary frozen autograft reconstruction. This method showed promising functional outcomes and provided durable reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level IV therapeutic study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".