Structural basis of the mechanism and inhibition of a human ceramide synthase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ceramides are bioactive sphingolipids crucial for regulating cellular metabolism. Ceramides and dihydroceramides are synthesized by six ceramide synthase (CerS) enzymes, each with specificity for different acyl-CoA substrates. Ceramide with a 16-carbon acyl chain (C16 ceramide) has been implicated in obesity, insulin resistance and liver disease and the C16 ceramide-synthesizing CerS6 is regarded as an attractive drug target for obesity-associated disease. Despite their importance, the molecular mechanism underlying ceramide synthesis by CerS enzymes remains poorly understood. Here we report cryo-electron microscopy structures of human CerS6, capturing covalent intermediate and product-bound states. These structures, along with biochemical characterization, reveal that CerS catalysis proceeds through a ping-pong reaction mechanism involving a covalent acyl-enzyme intermediate. Notably, the product-bound structure was obtained upon reaction with the mycotoxin fumonisin B1, yielding insights into its inhibition of CerS. These results provide a framework for understanding CerS function, selectivity and inhibition and open routes for future drug discovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".