MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404236532 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0526

DDDR-41. A GENOME-WIDE CRISPR/CAS9 SCREEN IN GLIOBLASTOMA STEM CELLS UNVEILS SYNTHETIC LETHAL INTERACTIONS AND RESISTANCE MECHANISMS OF JIN001, A BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER-PENETRANT HSP90 INHIBITOR

2024· article· en· W4404236532 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiaohua Chen, Nazanin Esmaeili Anvar, Medina Colic, Jihong Xu, Jiyong Liang, Pratibha Sharma, Longfei Huo, Harsha Sugur, Traver Hart, Vinay K. Puduvalli

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCRISPRPenetrant (biochemical)Blood–brain barrierGlioblastomaBiologyCancer researchNeuroscienceGeneticsGeneCentral nervous systemBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Glioblastomas (GBMs) are aggressive brain tumors characterized by extensive genetic heterogeneity and therapeutic resistance. Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is a molecular chaperone that stabilizes and facilitates the proper folding of numerous proteins, including oncogenic drivers and is overexpressed in cancers. Hsp90 inhibitors can disrupt multiple oncogenic signaling pathways by degrading various client proteins essential for tumor growth and survival, making them attractive therapeutic candidates for GBMs. We have previously reported on the efficacy of Hsp90 inhibitors against gliomas. However, cancer cells develop resistance to Hsp90 inhibitors by upregulating compensatory chaperones (e.g., Hsp70), mutating client proteins, or activating alternative survival pathways, reducing the long-term efficacy of these agents. Combination approaches overcoming such resistance mechanisms are needed. JIN001, a novel Hsp90 inhibitor, demonstrates superior blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration, and high potential for clinical translation. we performed a genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screen using the Toronto Knockout Library v3 (TKOv3) with screen selection pressure from JIN001 in GBM stem cells (GSC272) to identify synthetic lethal interactions and resistance mechanisms associated with JIN001 treatment. Experiments were performed in triplicate with two time points, T22 and T37. Quality control analysis of the NGS data indicated excellent quality and consistency between different replicates. DrugZ analysis revealed a set of sensitive and resistant genes, informing potential combination therapies and further elucidating JIN001’s mechanism of action. Validation studies for the top synthetic lethal targets are underway to confirm the identified interactions and will be presented. This CRISPR-Cas9 screen offers valuable insights into JIN001’s therapeutic potential, reveals new combination strategies to overcome resistance to Hsp90 inhibitors and for use of these agents in other cancers, and paves the way for the development of more effective GBM combination treatment strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207