MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404237082 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0122

BIOM-50. SERIAL INTRACRANIAL CEREBROSPINAL CELL-FREE DNA FOR DISEASE MONITORING IN PATIENTS WITH GLIOMAS

2024· article· en· W4404237082 on OpenAlexaff
Cécile Riviere-Cazaux, Xiaoxi Dong, Wei Mo, Rahul Kumar, Lucas P. Carlstrom, Cody L. Nesvick, Katherine Andersen, Matthew D. Hoplin, Ignacio Jusué-Torres, Noor Malik, Uğur Sener, Michael W. Ruff, Joon H. Uhm, Jian Campian, Jeanette E. Eckel‐Passow, Timothy J. Kaufmann, David M. Routman, Sani H. Kizilbash, Shidong Jia, Pan Du, Arthur E. Warrington, Terry C. Burns

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCerebrospinal fluidBrain CellMedicineBrain diseasePathologyDiseaseBiologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Improved response assessment methods are needed for patients with gliomas. Intracranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is longitudinally accessible and provides an abundance source of candidate biomarkers, such as cell-free DNA (cfDNA), for disease monitoring. To evaluate the clinical feasibility of molecular profiling from longitudinal intracranial CSF, CSF was acquired from patients with CSF access devices, including Ommaya reservoirs and ventriculoperitoneal shunts. cfDNA was extracted and analyzed via PredicineCARE (Next Generation sequencing) or PredicineSCORE (low pass whole genome sequencing). Five patients (2 females, 3 males; median age: 40 years, range 32-64 years) underwent longitudinal intracranial CSF collection via Ommaya reservoirs (n=4) or VP shunt (n=1). In total, forty-eight CSF samples were obtained (median volume: 4.00 mL; 0.5-5 mL), with 39 samples (81.3%) yielding sufficient cfDNA for variant profiling. Our initial findings suggest that tumor fraction increased by 6.28x, 2.87x, and 8.31x with radiographic progression in three patients. Tumor fraction decreased by 0.08x and 0.04x in two patients with paired immediate pre-versus-post chemoradiation samples. Despite ongoing pseudoprogression in one patient, tumor fraction decreased to unmeasurable levels from a post-resection baseline of 0.26. Patient-specific tumor-associated variant allelic frequencies (VAFs), including TP53, PTEN, TERT, and CDKN2A/B, decreased within individual patients after resection and chemoradiation. In two patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas, decreasing IDH1 VAF after resection and chemoradiation correlated with decreased CSF D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG) levels (0.64x and 0.62x, respectively, for the first patient, and 0.01x and 0.07x for the other patient). Both CSF IDH1 VAF and CSF D-2-HG increased a patient who had radiographic progression (2.56x and 9.21x, respectively). Moreover, CNB decreased below the limit of quantification during treatment and increased above the limit at progression. In conclusion, longitudinal CSF cfDNA can feasibly be obtained via CSF access devices in patients with gliomas during their disease course toward evaluating candidate monitoring biomarkers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→