BIOM-72. INTEGRATION OF ULTRASENSITIVE ELECTROLUMINESCENT IMMUNOASSAY AND CELL-FREE DNAMETHYLATION ANALYSIS FOR NON-INVASIVE MONITORING OF ADULT DIFFUSE GLIOMAS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Gliomas are highly aggressive brain tumors with nearly universal recurrence rate. Despite this, the ability to accurately predict and identify tumor recurrence relies solely on serial MRI imaging, which is marred by treatment effects such as radiation necrosis, and necessarily identifies progression retrospectively. It is believe that tumor undergo molecular changes upon tumor progression, however the resampling of tumors upon recurrence imposes significant risks. This highlights the need for novel non-invasive biomarkers capable of identifying tumor recurrence. Due to the low accuracies of individual biomarkers, we have proposed the use of an integrated, multi-platform approach to biomarker discovery. A cohort of 107 glioma plasma samples, including 30 pairs, underwent plasma proteomic analysis, consisting of a panel of serum proteins (FABP4, GFAP, NFL, Tau and MMP3,4 &7) quantified through ultrasensitive electrochemiluminescence multiplexed immunoassays, and plasma DNA methylation analysis, captured through cell-free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing. Unsupervised hierarchal clustering revealed robust separation of primary and recurrent tumors through plasma proteomics, associated with a distinct plasma methylation signature. NFL, Tau and MMP3 levels differed between primary and recurrent samples; pair-wise analysis revealed increased in NFL and Tau concentrations upon recurrence. Tau levels predicted outcome independent of WHO Grade and IDH status. A predictive generalized linear regression model created through the integration of the proteomic and methylation signatures allowed for the discrimination of primary and recurrent samples in 83% of cases. This work suggests that the combination of DNA methylation and plasma proteomics may improve the ability of these techniques for the serial monitoring of gliomas patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".