MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404237320 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0027

EPCO-28. UNVEILING INVASIVE MECHANISMS OF GLIOBLASTOMA CELLS THROUGH MULTIMODAL SINGLE-CELL SEQUENCING

2024· article· en· W4404237320 on OpenAlexaff
Yiyan Wu, Benson Z. Wu, Yosef Ellenbogen, Sheila Mansouri, J A Kant, Xuyao Li, Olivia Singh, Parnian Habibi, Pathum Kossinna, Sandra Ruth Lau Rodriguez, Andrew Gao, Gelareh Zadeh, Federico Gaiti

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlioblastomaNeuroscienceBiologyCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignancy of the central nervous system, characterized by a dismal prognosis and inevitable recurrence despite aggressive standard-of-care therapy. Extensive colonization of the surrounding brain parenchyma precludes complete surgical resection, posing a significant therapeutic challenge. While well-studied in model systems, the molecular features and epigenetic regulators of invasive GBM cells remain under-explored directly in clinical samples. To address this gap, we performed a multimodal single-cell sequencing characterization of GBM tumor samples from anatomically distinct regions collected using MRI guidance. Our results demonstrate an enrichment of progenitor-like (neural- and oligodendrocyte-like) malignant states and neurons at the tumor margins. In contrast, differentiated-like states and myeloid cells were more abundant in the tumor core. Peri-tumoral progenitor-like malignant states expressed a unique neuronal signature associated with synaptic signaling, neurogenesis, and Notch signaling. Further, the expression of this neuronal signature was correlated with increased invasiveness. Analysis of matched primary-recurrent GBM patient cohorts revealed an expansion of this neuronal activity program, which was associated with worse overall survival. Motifs of proneural transcription factors implicated in neuronal lineage differentiation were also found to be differentially accessible in progenitor-like malignant states marked by the neuronal invasive signature, potentially contributing to the remodeling of cell states at the invasive margin. Further, cell-cell interaction analysis predicted greater communication between neurons and peri-tumoral progenitor-like malignant states, mediated predominantly through neurexin-neuroligin trans-synaptic signaling, facilitating synaptogenesis and the integration of tumor cells into neural circuits. Altogether, these findings suggest a model in which GBM invasive cells communicate with normal brain neurons in peri-tumoral regions, exploiting neurodevelopmental pathways to facilitate invasion and potentially seed recurrence. Our characterization of invasive GBM cells provides insight into the mechanisms of brain invasion and highlights potential therapeutic vulnerabilities of malignant invasive cells. Understanding these mechanisms opens new avenues for targeted therapies aimed at curtailing the invasive and adaptive capabilities of GBM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→