MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404237571 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0563

EPID-27. THE INCIDENCE OF BRAIN METASTASIS IN GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER ACCORDING TO PRIMARY SITE AND STAGE: A 15-YEAR SINGLE INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

2024· article· en· W4404237571 on OpenAlexaff
Marc Vincent Barcelona, K. Kataki, Fadwa Abdel Rahman, David Schultz, Barbara‐Ann Millar, Tatiana Conrad, Mojgan Taremi, Paul Kongkham, Elena Elimova, Yangqing Deng, Michael Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBrain Metastases and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSouthlake Regional Health CenterPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStage (stratigraphy)Incidence (geometry)Brain metastasisCancerMedicineMetastasisGastrointestinal cancerOncologyInternal medicineColorectal cancerBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are a diverse group of cancers including pancreatic, gastric/gastroesophageal junction/esophageal (G/GEJ/E), colorectal (CRC), hepatocellular (HCC), biliary tract (BT), and anal origin cancers. The risk of developing brain metastasis (BrM) is not well characterized. The aim was to determine the incidence of BrM among all GI cancer patients at Princess Margaret Hospital (PM). We included patients diagnosed with GI cancer presenting from 2005-2020, captured prospectively in our institutional registry. These patients were cross-referenced with our radiotherapy database, where radiotherapy for brain metastases (BrM) was used as a proxy for the brain metastases development. Cumulative incidences (CI) of BrM diagnoses were calculated using death as a competing risk. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. The registry accounted for 22,188 patients. The median age of the cohort was 64. Most common primary sites are CRC adenocarcinoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, G/GEJ/E adenocarcinoma were 31.52%/11.71%/10.25%. The 15-year CI for BrM for the entire cohort was 1.65%, and for CRC, small bowel, anal, pancreatic, G/GEJ/E, HCC, and BT cancers were 2.69%/2.49%/1.30%/0.5%/3.52%/ 0.05% /0.4% (p < 0.001) and Stage I-IV disease were 0.39%/0.81%/1.2%/3.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). 5 year CI for HER2 positive G/GEJ/E patients was 19.5%. Median OS from initial presentation for those with BrM was 25.13 months. On univariable analysis, chemotherapy receipt [HR 1.916, p < 0.001], Stage IV at presentation [HR 3.991, p < 0.001], and G/GEJ/E primary [HR 1.357, p < 0.001] predicted for higher risk of BrM. Multivariable analysis confirmed that receipt of chemotherapy and Stage IV disease predicted a higher risk for BrM and pancreatic, HCC, and BT cancers predicted for lower BrM. We observed that among patients diagnosed with GI cancers, Stage IV disease predicted higher risk for developing BrM and were more likely to receive chemotherapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicBrain Metastases and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207