MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404238060 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0243

STEM-17. THE UROKINASE RECEPTOR AS A NOVEL IMMUNOTHERAPEUTIC TARGET IN BRAIN CANCERS

2024· article· en· W4404238060 on OpenAlexaff
William Maich, Muhammad Vaseem Shaikh, Anish Puri, Daniel Mobilio, Alisha Ananda, Chitra Venugopal, Martín A. Rossotti, Nick Mikolajewicz, Chirayu Chokshi, Sabra K. Salim, Neil Savage, Thomas Kislinger, Kevin A. Henry, Sheila K. Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrokinase receptorReceptorCancer researchMedicineOncologyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the common malignant brain tumor in adults, accounting for approximately 15% of all CNS tumors, and 48.6% of malignant brain tumors, with a median survival of approximately 15 months. GBM is characterized by extensive inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity and an extremely immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Following Standard-of-Care surgical resection and chemoradiotherapy, patients inevitably relapse, at which point few therapeutic avenues exist, owing in part due to a lack of clinically relevant targets. Data from our target identification pipeline shows the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is significantly upregulated at recurrence on putative GBM brain tumor initiating cells (BTICs), which are believed to drive de novo tumor formation, recurrence, and therapeutic resistance. uPAR plays an important role in the plasminogen activation system, and in the context of cancer, has been implicated in numerous pro-tumorigenic processes such as invasion, proliferation, and therapy resistance. We used CRISPR-Cas9 to genetically delete uPAR from our in-house patient-derived GBM cell lines, and found that knockout of uPAR in recurrent GBM cells significantly reduces various functional characteristics of BTICs in vitro. In our patient-derived mouse model of GBM, we found that knockout of uPAR significantly increases survival, and decreases tumor burden. Further, we generated novel anti-uPAR single domain antibodies (sdAbs) which specifically and efficiently bind uPAR at low nanomolar concentrations in vitro. We developed anti-uPAR CAR Ts using the binder sequence of the sdAbs, which showed potent cytotoxicity in vitro, and drastically reduced tumor burden and extended survival in vivo. Further, we identified uPAR as being highly expressed on brain metastases from multiple origins (lung-to-brain, melanoma-to-brain, etc.), and demonstrate that anti-uPAR CAR Ts effectively kill brain metastases in vitro, and significantly extend survival using in vivo brain metastasis models. From this work we believe uPAR to be a clinically relevant target in both recurrent GBM and brain metastases, and investigation into therapeutic strategies targeting uPAR-positive brain cancers should be explored further.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways→French-language works237,207→