<i>Féminités féministes</i>. Métamorphoses d’un paradoxe1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ENG / Against the backdrop of a crisis in ecological and social (re)production, challenging liberal and universalist feminism, as well as its tendency to "catch up" with masculine ideals, is becoming increasingly urgent. Does the construction of more just and sustainable societies require reconnecting with certain dispositions, practices, or norms traditionally associated with the feminine? The recent success of care ethics, ecofeminism, and the "genital" turn in feminism renews a thorny dilemma that feminisms have long faced: the rejection of values traditionally associated with the "feminine" perpetuates forms of misogyny and the superiority of the so-called "masculine" ethos; yet, their valorization risks reinforcing binary and patriarchal gender categories, reassigning women and gender minorities to roles from which they seek to emancipate themselves. This article aims to clarify the conditions for the possibility of feminist femininities. We propose some avenues for negotiating these paradoxes and fostering fruitful alliances between critiques and emancipatory reappropriations of femininity. FR/ Sur arrière plan d’une crise de la (re)production écologique et sociale, les remises en question du féminisme libéral et universaliste, ainsi que de sa tendance au "rattrapage" d'idéaux masculins, se font de plus en plus pressantes. La construction de sociétés plus justes et durables nécessiterait-elle de renouer avec certaines dispositions, pratiques ou normes traditionnellement associées au féminin ? Le succès récent des éthiques du care, de l'écoféminisme ou encore du tournant "génital" du féminisme renouvelle ainsi un dilemme épineux auquel les féminismes sont confrontés depuis longtemps : le rejet des valeurs traditionnellement associées au "féminin" reconduit des formes de misogynie et la supériorité de l’éthos dit "masculin" ; mais leur valorisation risque de renforcer les catégories binaires et patriarcales du genre, réassignant les femmes et les minorités de genre à des rôles dont elles cherchent à s’émanciper. Cet article se propose de préciser les conditions de possibilité des féminités féministes. Nous avançons quelques pistes pour négocier ces paradoxes et cultiver des alliances fécondes entre critiques et réappropriations émancipatrices de la féminité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.047 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".