MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404261009 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.16596

Galerkin Scheme Using Biorthogonal Wavelets on Intervals for Elliptic Interface Problems

2024· preprint· en· W4404261009 on OpenAlex
Bin Han, Michelle Michelle

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsBiorthogonal systemWaveletScheme (mathematics)Galerkin methodInterface (matter)MathematicsApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisComputer scienceWavelet transformFinite element methodEngineeringStructural engineeringParallel computingArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a wavelet Galerkin method for solving elliptic interface problems of the form $-\nabla\cdot(a\nabla u)=f$ in $Ω\backslash Γ$, where $Γ$ is a smooth interface within $Ω$. Since the scalar variable coefficient $a>0$ and source term $f$ are often discontinuous across $Γ$, the solution $u$ typically has discontinuous gradient $\nabla u$ across $Γ$ and hence $u\not\in H^{1.5}(Ω)$, posing significant challenges for traditional numerical methods. By utilizing a compactly supported biorthogonal wavelet for $H^1_0(Ω)$, we develop a strategy that incorporates additional wavelet elements (or basis functions) along the interface to resolve the complex geometry of the interface $Γ$ and the resulting gradient discontinuities. For the two-dimensional (2D) elliptic interface problem, the proposed method achieves near-optimal convergence rates: $\mathcal{O}(h |\log(h)|)$ in the $H^1(Ω)$-norm and $\mathcal(h^2 |\log(h)|^2)$ in the $L^{2}$-norm with respect to the approximation order. A key theoretical contribution is the use of the dual biorthogonal wavelet basis to establish the $H^1(Ω)$ convergence results. This is supported by the development of weighted Bessel properties for wavelets and several inequalities in fractional Sobolev spaces. To maintain high accuracy and robustness against high-contrast coefficients, our method leverages an augmented set of wavelet elements, similar to meshfree approaches, thereby eliminating the need for the complex re-meshing required by finite element methods. Unlike existing techniques, this wavelet Riesz basis framework captures the geometry of $Γ$ seamlessly while ensuring that the condition numbers of the coefficient matrices remain small and uniformly bounded, independent of the problem size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.101 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it