MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404261009 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.16596

Galerkin Scheme Using Biorthogonal Wavelets on Intervals for Elliptic Interface Problems

2024· preprint· en· W4404261009 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Bin Han, Michelle Michelle

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsBiorthogonal systemWaveletScheme (mathematics)Galerkin methodInterface (matter)MathematicsApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisComputer scienceWavelet transformFinite element methodEngineeringStructural engineeringParallel computingArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a wavelet Galerkin method for solving elliptic interface problems of the form $-\nabla\cdot(a\nabla u)=f$ in $Ω\backslash Γ$, where $Γ$ is a smooth interface within $Ω$. Since the scalar variable coefficient $a>0$ and source term $f$ are often discontinuous across $Γ$, the solution $u$ typically has discontinuous gradient $\nabla u$ across $Γ$ and hence $u\not\in H^{1.5}(Ω)$, posing significant challenges for traditional numerical methods. By utilizing a compactly supported biorthogonal wavelet for $H^1_0(Ω)$, we develop a strategy that incorporates additional wavelet elements (or basis functions) along the interface to resolve the complex geometry of the interface $Γ$ and the resulting gradient discontinuities. For the two-dimensional (2D) elliptic interface problem, the proposed method achieves near-optimal convergence rates: $\mathcal{O}(h |\log(h)|)$ in the $H^1(Ω)$-norm and $\mathcal(h^2 |\log(h)|^2)$ in the $L^{2}$-norm with respect to the approximation order. A key theoretical contribution is the use of the dual biorthogonal wavelet basis to establish the $H^1(Ω)$ convergence results. This is supported by the development of weighted Bessel properties for wavelets and several inequalities in fractional Sobolev spaces. To maintain high accuracy and robustness against high-contrast coefficients, our method leverages an augmented set of wavelet elements, similar to meshfree approaches, thereby eliminating the need for the complex re-meshing required by finite element methods. Unlike existing techniques, this wavelet Riesz basis framework captures the geometry of $Γ$ seamlessly while ensuring that the condition numbers of the coefficient matrices remain small and uniformly bounded, independent of the problem size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.101 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207