MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404261537 · doi:10.1101/2024.11.12.622464

Resource landscape shapes the composition and stability of the human vaginal microbiota

2024· preprint· en· W4404261537 on OpenAlexaff
Tsukushi Kamiya, Mircea T. Sofonea, Michael France, Nicolas Tessandier, Ignacio G. Bravo, Carmen Lía Murall, Jacques Ravel, Samuel Alizon

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of Canada
FundersCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueAgence Nationale de la RechercheFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleStyrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
KeywordsBacterial vaginosisSialic acidBiologyMicrobiomeBacteriaHuman microbiomeMicrobiologyEcologyBioinformaticsBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The vaginal microbiota is associated with the health of women and newborns alike. Despite its comparatively simple composition relative to other human microbiota systems, the mechanisms underpinning the dynamics and stability of vaginal microbial communities remain elusive. A crucial, yet so far underexplored, aspect of vaginal microbiota ecology is the role played by nutritional resources. Glycogen and its derivatives, produced by vaginal epithelia, are accessible to all bacterial constituents of the microbiota. Concurrently, free sialic acid and fucose offer supplementary nutritional resources to bacterial strains capable of cleaving them from glycans, which are structurally integral to mucus. Notably, bacteria adept at sialic acid exploitation are often correlated with adverse clinical outcomes and are frequently implicated in bacterial vaginosis (BV). In this study, we introduce a novel mathematical model tailored to human vaginal microbiota dynamics to explore the interactions between bacteria and their respective nutritional landscape. Our resource-based model examines the impact of the relative availability of glycogen derivatives (accessible to all bacterial species) and sialic acid (exclusive to some BV-associated bacteria) on the composition of the vaginal microbiota. Our findings elucidate that the success of BV-associated bacteria is intricately linked to their exclusive access to specific nutritional resources. This private access fortifies communities dominated by BV-associated bacteria, rendering them resilient to compositional transitions. We empirically corroborate our model prediction with longitudinal clinical data on microbiota composition and previously unpublished metabolomic profiles obtained from a North American cohort. The insights gleaned from this study shed light on potential pathways for BV prevention and treatment. Significance statement The vaginal microbiota has a notable impact on women’s health at various stages of life, namely puberty, infection protection, sexual health, fertility, pregnancy, and menopausal changes. At present, most non-anti-microbial products developed to mitigate adverse vaginal symptoms emphasise competitive interactions through acids (boric or lactic acid) or probiotics as a means to “rebalance” microbiota communities. Despite recent advances in profiling the composition of vaginal microbiota communities, there remains a major gap in our mechanistic understanding of how to maintain or reinstate a resilient Lactobacillus -dominated microbiota that improves vaginal health and outcomes. This study explores the role of nutritional resources in the vaginal microbiota by introducing a mathematical model that analyses how access to specific nutrients like glycogen derivatives and sialic acid affects the balance of bacterial vaginosis (BV) and non-BV-associated bacteria. Our findings, supported by original cohort-derived microbiological and metabolomics data, demonstrate that exclusive access to these nutrients is linked to the dominance and resilience of BV-associated bacteria, providing new insights for BV prevention and treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicReproductive tract infections researchFrench-language works237,207