MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404293528 · doi:10.1016/j.erap.2024.101045

Relationship status-mental health concerns association: An examination of attachment and attention

2024· article· en· W4404293528 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Review of Applied Psychology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAttachment and Relationship Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
FundersUniversité de Moncton
KeywordsAssociation (psychology)Mental healthPsychologyClinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatryPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Past studies have revealed an advantage of marriage over singlehood, but the role of relationship status in mental health concerns needs further investigation. This paper examined the connection between relationship status and mental health concerns and explored the cognitive and affective mechanisms explaining it, using a multi-method approach. Study 1 was an online study with equal groups of married ( n = 125) or single individuals ( n = 125), whereas Study 2 was a probabilistic laboratory study with two natural groups of individuals that were either single ( n = 21) or in a relationship ( n = 89). Path analyses showed that attachment avoidance and attentional control could act as mediators explaining the role of relationship status in mental health concerns. We showed that being in a relationship or being married was associated with better mental health and that the benefits of marriage and couple life on mental health were explained by attachment and attention. Des études antérieures ont révélé un avantage du mariage par rapport au célibat, mais le rôle du statut relationnel dans les problèmes de santé mentale doit être étudié davantage. Ainsi, cet article examine le lien entre le statut relationnel et les problèmes de santé mentale et explore les mécanismes cognitifs et affectifs qui l’expliquent, en utilisant une approche multiméthodes. L’Étude 1 est une étude en ligne avec des groupes égaux de personnes mariées ( n = 125) ou célibataires ( n = 125), tandis que l’Étude 2 est une étude probabiliste en laboratoire avec deux groupes naturels de personnes célibataires ( n = 21) ou en couple ( n = 89). Les analyses acheminatoires montrent que l’évitement de l’attachement et le contrôle attentionnel agissent comme variables médiatrices expliquant le rôle du statut relationnel dans les problèmes de santé mentale. Cet article révèle que le fait d’être en couple ou d’être marié est associé à une meilleure santé mentale et que les bénéfices du mariage et de la vie de couple sur la santé mentale sont expliqués par l’attachement et l’attention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score0.602

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.392 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it