MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of Covid-19 Infection on Incidence and Exacerbation of Overactive Bladder Symptoms: A Systematic Review

2024· review· en· W4404301497 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hossein Amini, Behzad Einollahi, Seyed Hassan Saadat, Mehdi Raei, Eghlim Nemati, Kiavash Hushmandi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Open Public Health Journal · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermal Regulation in Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOveractive bladderCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)ExacerbationMedicineIncidence (geometry)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSystematic reviewIntensive care medicineMEDLINEUrologyInternal medicineVirologyDiseaseBiologyPathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The COVID-19 pandemic continues to be a major global health concern. A key factor is the presence of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors in various organs, including the lungs, heart, bladder, and testicles. These receptors allow the SARS-CoV-2 virus to enter cells, making these organs vulnerable to damage. This vulnerability may explain why some patients experience non-respiratory symptoms. Notably, overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms and a condition called COVID-associated cystitis (CAC) have been reported to negatively affect the quality of life of COVID-19 patients. A systematic review is needed to summarize the current understanding of these urological aspects of SARS-CoV-2 infection, considering both short- and long-term effects. Methods We conducted a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to investigate urological complications of COVID-19, with a specific focus on OAB symptoms and CAC (characterized by frequent urination, urgency, and nocturia). We searched databases, including Medline (PubMed), Embase, and Scopus. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, and the quality of each study was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results Our search identified 343 articles published up to March 2024, of which 12 were included in this review. Many of the studies utilized scoring systems such as the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and OAB symptom scores. The evidence suggests that COVID-19 may trigger or worsen lower urinary tract symptoms, OAB, and cystitis in some patients, regardless of gender or age. However, these effects appear to be uncommon. Several studies reported an increase in IPSS scores, though it remains unclear whether this increase is temporary or long-lasting. A few studies found that symptoms resolved over several months. Conclusion This systematic review suggests that COVID-19 may affect the urinary system, leading to symptoms such as frequent urination, urgency, and nocturia. These symptoms can negatively impact the quality of life in COVID-19 patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.521
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Open Public Health JournalSame topicThermal Regulation in MedicineFrench-language works237,207