Adjuvant Radioactive Iodine Ablation in Tall Cell Subtype Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Introduction</h3> Tall cell subtype papillary thyroid cancer (TCS-PTC) is associated with aggressive disease features and worse patient outcomes. It remains unclear whether adjuvant radioactive iodine (RAI) ablation following thyroidectomy is associated with improved survival in TCS-PTC. The purpose of this review and meta-analysis was to determine whether adjuvant RAI was associated with improved survival in patients with TCS-PTC. <h3>Methods</h3> We included any study design that investigated survival outcomes in adult patients diagnosed with TCS-PTC who underwent either thyroidectomy following by adjuvant RAI or thyroidectomy alone. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases from inception with no restrictions. All screening and review stages were performed in duplicate. Risk of bias was evaluated using ROBINS-I and certainty of evidence were evaluated using GRADE. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model and we calculated pooled hazard ratios (HRs), where applicable. All analyses were performed in RevMan 5.3 (Cochrane, UK). <h3>Results</h3> Seven nonrandomized studies were included with 9611 TCS-PTC patients, of which 6296 (65.5%) underwent adjuvant RAI. All studies were at high risk of bias. Based on low certainty evidence, we found that adjuvant RAI was possibly associated with improved overall survival in TCS-PTC (HR = 0.60, 95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.85). This benefit was maintained in studies that performed propensity score matching, but we did not find a significant association with tumor size. Sensitivity analysis to remove studies with potentially overlapping data changed the HR to 0.74 (95% CI: 0.46-1.19) with considerable heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 70%). Based on very low certainty evidence, we were uncertain where adjuvant RAI was associated with cancer-specific or recurrence-free survival. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Adjuvant RAI may be associated with improved overall survival in TCS-PTC, but future high-quality randomized studies with risk stratification are needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".