MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404320576 · doi:10.1386/9781789389807_3

Architecture and Complexity, New Heterogeneous Spaces, and Old ‘New Media’

2024· book-chapter· en· W4404320576 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Irena Latek

Bibliographic record

VenueMediated cities series. · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture and Computational Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureComputer scienceComputer architectureGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Irena Latek, Canadian architect and artist, is professor at the school of Architecture of l'Université de Montréal, director of the laboratory of research-creation « medialabAU ». Architect graduated from the Polytechnic School of Warsaw, she also studied at the University of Montreal. She was director of the Research Institute for the History of Architecture (IRHA) of Canadian Centre for Architecture, Université de Montréal and the University McGill from 1997 to 2000 and founding member of the Institute Art Culture Technologie of l'Université de Montréal (IACT). Irena Latek situates her research at the junction of architecture and the medias digital arts. The projects she has realized with the « medialabAU » team in video, or through interactive interfaces, take the form of installations questioning contemporary urbanities. She developed the « collage mouvant », an original method for the conception of architecture and the interpretation of space through video. Her work has been exhibited in Canada, Spain, Germany and France; notably she presented monographic exhibitions: Intervalles, Montreal, Cinémathèque québécoise, 2015-2016, Flux, Montreal, Centre d'Exposition, UdeM, 2015, Transporters Ecotopia —Utopia, Montréal, Centre d'Exposition, UdeM, 2009, Ubiquités publiques Desynchronized Public Spaces, Montréal, SAT, 2005, Espaces mouvants Soft Public Spaces, Montréal, SAT, 2003 and Barcelona, Galerie Ras 2004. Her work has been the subject of several articles and press reviews. She presents in a theoretical return her work in numerous articles, chapters of books and her monographic book, among which are: « Espacements ». In In situ / de visu / in motu. Architecture, cinéma et arts technologiques. edited by Irena Latek, Sophie Paviol, Clotilde Simond, and Françoise Very, Gollion: Infolio, 2014. « Sortie du cadre », In Perspectives sur la Perspective, edited by Philippe Cardinali and Marc Perelman, Paris: Fabula, 2017. Flux et Intervalles - Irena Latek. Montreal: Antheism-BookArt, 2017.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMediated cities series.Same topicArchitecture and Computational DesignFrench-language works237,207