Abstract 4134957: Survival and Cardiac Recovery in Pediatric Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Long-term Cohort Study of Risk Factors, Prognosis, and Health Outcomes Followed into Adulthood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of pediatric heart failure (HF), but there is limited literature on its long-term prognosis and treatment outcomes. We examined risk factors for long-term morbidity and mortality and outcomes of care in childhood-onset DCM. Methods: Electronic medical records from a tertiary care pediatric hospital (SickKids, Toronto, Canada) were used to retrospectively follow children ages 0–18 years with DCM from January 1, 2001 to July 1, 2017. Provincial healthcare administrative data was used to monitor outcomes recorded outside of SickKids, following patients during the same time period and into adulthood (age >18 years) until August 31, 2023. We compared DCM cases, with or without echocardiographic recovery (LVEDD z score < 2 and LVEF ≥ 55%), and controls matched on sex, age, and urban/rural residence on a range of health and health service outcomes. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, heart transplant (HT), and inpatient admission for HF. Among cases, Cox proportional hazards regression with backwards selection was used to identify demographic, disease, and treatment characteristics associated with each primary outcome, with candidate variables selected based on univariate analysis and clinical judgment. Results: We studied 156 patients with DCM and 780 controls for a median of 14.8 years. Median age at the end of follow-up was 16.2 years. Compared with controls, DCM cases had higher rates of all-cause death, HT, and HF admission (all P <0.001), as well as chronic kidney disease ( P <0.001) and diabetes ( P =0.002). Compared to cases with recovered DCM (n=53), non-recovered cases had higher rates of death, HT, and HF admission (all P <0.001). On multivariable analysis, beta blockers were associated with reduced mortality risk (HR 0.343, 95% CI 0.162–0.727). Using any HF medication (HR 0.205, 95% CI 0.102–0.412) and living in an urban versus a rural area (HR 0.166, 95% CI 0.048–0.573) decreased HT risk. Idiopathic (HR 4.16, 95% CI 1.42–12.2) or sarcomeric mutation-related (HR 9.86, 95% CI 2.30–42.3) DCM were associated with higher HT risk than myocarditis-related DCM. Conclusions: While childhood DCM is associated with long-term adverse health and increased health care utilization, patients who recover have improved morbidity and mortality. Treatment (e.g. medication or access to urban specialist care) was associated with lower mortality and HT risk in DCM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | high |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".