Abstract 4131460: Restrictive or Liberal Blood Transfusion in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Renal Insufficiency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and anemia. Among patients with CKD and anemia who experience MI, it remains uncertain if a liberal transfusion threshold (LTT) strategy (hemoglobin cutoff [Hgb] < 10 g/dL) is superior to a restrictive transfusion threshold (RTT, Hgb 7-8 g/dL) strategy. Objectives: To evaluate outcomes of those with CKD randomized to RTT vs. LTT in the Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion (MINT) trial (NCT02981407). Methods: Among 3,495 MINT participants with non-missing creatinine (99.7%), we compared the baseline characteristics and outcomes at 30 days post-randomization of those individuals without CKD (N = 1279), CKD with eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (N = 999), CKD with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (N = 802), and CKD requiring dialysis (N = 415), both overall and by randomized transfusion strategy. Interaction terms for eGFR category by treatment assignment on each outcome were assessed. Results: Individuals with CKD compared to those without CKD more frequently presented with NSTEMI (all p < 0.001) and had a greater risk of all-cause death, recurrent MI, rehospitalization, and heart failure (all p < 0.05). Compared to a liberal transfusion strategy, a restrictive strategy among non-dialysis dependent individuals with an eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 was associated with an increased risk of death/recurrent MI ( Figure 1 ) and unplanned rehospitalization ( Figure 2 ). Among individuals with an eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , a restrictive strategy was associated with an increased risk of cardiac death ( Figure 1 ). No eGFR category by treatment assignment interaction terms were significant. Conclusions: In this prespecified analysis, individuals with CKD were at greater risk of death, recurrent MI, heart failure, and unplanned rehospitalization at 30 days post-randomization than those without CKD. In individuals with CKD, a restrictive transfusion strategy was associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".