MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404327916 · doi:10.1002/smtd.202401179

Highly Active NiRu/C Cathode Catalyst Synthesized by Displacement Reaction for Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis

2024· article· en· W4404327916 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Stephan Ruck, Andreas Hutzler, Simon Thiele, Chuyen Van Pham

Bibliographic record

VenueSmall Methods · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsCatalysisElectrolysisGalvanic cellCathodeChemical engineeringAnodeMaterials scienceElectrolysis of waterInorganic chemistryHydrogenHydrogen productionMembraneIon exchangeElectrolytic cellChemistryElectrolyteIonMetallurgyElectrodePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Anion exchange membrane water electrolysis (AEMWE) is highly promising for cost‐effective green hydrogen production due to its basic operating conditions facilitating the use of non‐noble catalysts. While non‐noble Ni/Fe‐based catalysts are utilized at the anode, its cathode catalyst still requires precious Pt. Due to the high cost of Pt and the sluggish hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) at the cathode in basic conditions, developing alternative catalysts to replace Pt is highly important. Here, a synthesis procedure for a Ru‐based catalyst is reported and its high activity toward the HER in alkaline media is demonstrated in both half‐cell and single‐cell tests. The catalyst is synthesized in a two‐step approach. A highly dispersed Ni catalyst is prepared on carbon support in the first step. In the second step, Ru is deposited on its surface using a galvanic displacement reaction. The uniqueness of this method is that Ru is deposited over the entire electrically conductive surface, resulting in an isotropic and homogeneous Ru distribution within the catalyst powder. It is demonstrated that this material remarkably outperforms state‐of‐the‐art Pt/C catalysts in half‐cell and single‐cell tests. The single cell only requires 1.73 V at 1 A cm −2 with an overall PGM content of 0.05 mg cm −2 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSmall MethodsSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207