Dietary patterns in people with mild cognitive impairment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Dietary habits may be an essential modulator affecting diet-related cognitive decline. One hopes that their identification will allow opening the use of new approaches for the management of the prevention and treatment of patients with mild cognitive disorders and maintaining a good quality of life. The aim of the research was to characterize dietary habits in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The survey was conducted among 146 people. 101 patients in the MCI group and 45 people without cognitive impairment (n-MCI group) as control. The research tools were the Questionnaires Eating Behaviour (QEB) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) screening test. Patients were qualified into MCI group based on the MoCA screening test (25 or fewer points in the MoCA test). RESULTS: Differences were found in the hierarchical list of foods typically consumed at breakfast and lunch between participants in the MCI and n-MCI groups. It was also shown that among patients with MCI. a significantly smaller percentage of respondents consumed low-fat dairy products; (p=0.001) and total vegetables (p=0.034). as well as cereal products (p=0.001) and fish (p=0.007). At the same time. this group was characterized by a higher consumption of high-fat and sugar products (p=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: According to the findings. dietary behaviours based on diets low in saturated fats but rich in n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. as well as vitamins and bioactive substances. may be useful in preventing MCI. These health behaviors are known among people following the Nordic Diet from a northern cultural environment or the MD diet from Southern Europe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".