MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 4138498: Sex Differences in Plasma Acylcarnitines in Patients with STEMI undergoing Primary PCI

2024· article· en· W4404341264 on OpenAlexaff
J. Namkoong, Aleksandra Stamenković, Arun Surendran, Amir Ravandi

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSt. Boniface Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineConventional PCIInternal medicineCardiologyPrimary (astronomy)Myocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Rapid coronary reperfusion using primary PCI is the corner stone therapy for patients presenting with STEMI that restores blood flow and limits infarct size. But paradoxically, the reperfusion process itself can induce additional myocardial injury. Females have increased rates of cardiovascular death compared with males following MI, and it is unclear whether this is related to differences in presentation or reperfusion injury. Given these differences, we aim to better understand the sex differences in the lipidome shift post PCI. METHODS&RESULTS: 126 patients(97 males, 29 females) undergoing PCI for STEMI in a tertiary centre underwent venous blood sampling and semi-targeted Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry(LC/MS/MS) to determine 291 lipid species. Samples were taken pre-PCI(T0), and 2 hours post PCI(T1) with successful reperfusion. Each lipid class and species were compared between males and females at each time point using statistical analysis, to determine the similarities and differences in plasma lipidome shifts in ACS between sexes. Whilst most lipid classes decrease following reperfusion in STEMI (T0 vs T1), Acylcarnitines increase (20%, adjusted p=0.003) in both sexes. There is a clear sex difference with a greater increase in females (39% increase, adjusted p=0.03), as compared with males (13% increase, adjusted p=0.048). In both sexes this is primarily driven by OctadecanoylCarnitine (C8), which is a medium-chained acylcarnitine. Notably, there was no significant difference in C8 between the sexes in the control group, nor the pre-PCI group(adjusted p=0.48, at T0). At T0, total free fatty acids(FFA) and total phosphatidylinositol were significantly elevated in females compared with males(adjusted p=0.012, p=0.018 respectively). Conclusion: Our analysis suggests there are differences in lipidomics shift between males and females in response to myocardial reperfusion. The higher levels of circulating FFA in ischemic females pre-PCI(T0), followed by a parallel increase of acylcarnitine with reperfusion(T0vsT1), suggest differences between the sexes in myocardial metabolic response to reperfusion injury. C8 has been associated with elevated risk of cardiovascular death in stable CAD, but its clinical impact during reperfusion is still unknown. Detailed understanding of sex specific lipidomics shifts during reperfusion injury will allow us to better understand the mechanistic differences in clinical outcome between males and females.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207