Structural analysis and fatigue prediction of harrow tines used in Canadian prairies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Canadian prairies are renowned for their substantial agricultural contributions to the global food market. Harrow tines are indispensable in farming equipment, especially for soil preparation and weed control before planting crops. During operation, these tines are exposed to repetitive cyclic loading, which eventually causes fatigue failure. Commercially available three different harrow tines named 0.562HT, 0.625HT, and 0.500HT undergo an experimental fatigue evaluation and are validated through Finite Element Analysis (FEA). Fatigue life estimation for different deflections under various real-field deflections was carried out where 0.562HT showed groundbreaking life compared with others. The study results showed that the fatigue life is highly dependent on geometry, number of coils, pitch angle, leg length, and coil diameter. The 0.354HT model, developed to investigate the effect of wire diameter, closely resembles the 0.500HT model. The harrowing ability of the four different harrow tine models against identical deflections has been analyzed. Experimental fractured surfaces went through morphological investigation. This research has an impeccable impact on prairies' agricultural acceleration by saving time and mitigating unpredictable fatigue failure often faced by farmers. Even the observed failure phenomena can serve as motivation to develop more reliable and durable harrow tines, which could increase agricultural efficiency. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42452-024-06310-5.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".