MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Writing Travelogues in the Early Nineteenth Century: The Story Behind Mary Holderness’s Travel Account of Journeying from Riga to Crimea via Kyiv

2024· article· en· W4404346823 on OpenAlex
Nataliia Voloshkova

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUkrainian Historical Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTravel Writing and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHistoryAncient historyArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DOI: 10.47632/2786-717X-2024-3-117-141 УДК 94:910.4(470+571)"18"(093) Як цитувати: Nataliia Voloshkova, Writing Travelogues in the Early Nineteenth Century: The Story Behind Mary Holderness’s Travel Account of Journeying from Riga to Crimea via Kyiv, Ukrainian Historical Review / Український історичний огляд, IІІ | 2024, 117–141. Nataliia Voloshkova Writing Travelogues in the Early Nineteenth Century: The Story Behind Mary Holderness’s Travel Account of Journeying from Riga to Crimea via Kyiv This article explores travel accounts penned by two British travelers who journeyed through and resided in the Russian empire in the early nineteenth century: the agriculturalist Arthur Young (1769-1827) and Mary Holderness, an author of “Journey from Riga to the Crimea, with Some Accounts of the Manners and Customs of the Colonists of New Russia” (1827) and other travel accounts. Drawing on unpublished correspondence recently uncovered in the British archives, the article expands our knowledge about their travels on the territory of present-day Ukraine, including Kyiv, and their residence and activities in Crimea. The article also sheds light on the production, reception, and impact of Holderness’s travelogue both in Britain and other European countries such as France, Switzerland, Germany, and the Netherlands, thus adding to our understanding of the ways in which knowledge about the world was disseminated in the period. Through comparative textual analysis of her narrative and earlier published travel texts, particularly those penned by the famed female travel writers, Elizabeth Craven and Mary Wortley Montagu, the article explores Holderness’s intertextual strategies and illuminates the ways in which travel books were produced in the period. The article not only identifies important thematic, stylistic, and visual continuities in early-nineteenth-century travel writing, but it also traces the emergence of new themes in contemporary discourse (corruption of the courts in New Russia in Holderness’s text). References Allen Graham. Intertextuality. London and New York 2000. Borm Jan. Defining Travel: On the Travel Book, Travel Writing and Terminology // Perspectives on Travel Writing / ed. Glenn Hooper and Tim Youngs. Aldershot 2004, p. 13–26. Cross Anthony G. “By the Banks of the Thames”: Russians in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Newtonville 1980. Dashkova E. R. Zapiski. Pisma sester M. i K. Vilmot iz Rossii / ed. G. A. Veseloj. Moskva 1987 [Дашкова Е. Р. Записки. Письма сестер М. и К. Вильмот из России / ред. Г. А. Веселой. Москва 1987]. [In Russian.] Deremedved Elena. Krymskaya rivera: Avantyurnye priklyucheniya anglichanok v Tavride. Simferopol 2008 [Деремедведь Елена. Крымская ривьера: Авантюрные приключения англичанок в Тавриде. Симферополь 2008]. [In Russian.] Gazley John G. The Reverend Arthur Young, 1769–1827: Traveller in Russia and Farmer in the Crimea // Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 38 (2) (1956) 360–405. Hrapunov Nikita. Kak opisat etnografiyu imperskoj provincii: Meri Houlderness v Krymu // Izvestiya Uralskogo federalnogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Gumanitarnye nauki 22 (2020) 174–189 [Храпунов Никита. Как описать этнографию имперской провинции: Мери Хоулдернесс в Крыму // Известия Уральського федерального университета. Серия 2: Гуманитарные науки 22 (2020) 174–189]. [In Russian.] Kravchenko Volodymyr. In Search of ‘Ukraine’ in the Russian Empire (End of Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries) // Eighteenth-Century Ukraine: New Perspectives on Social, Cultural, and Intellectual History / ed. Zenon E. Kohut, Volodymyr Sklokin, and Frank E. Sysyn, with Larysa Bilous. Montreal&Kingston 2023, p. 57–98. Loevskaya Anastasiya. Sluzhenie Otechestvu: pravoslavnyj svyashennik v Londone Yakov Smirnov (1780–1840) // Imagines mundi: Almanah issledovanij vseobshej istorii XV–XX vv., no 6. Ekaterinburg 2008, s. 321–339 [Лоевская Анастасия Ю. Служение Отечеству: православный священник в Лондоне Яков Смирнов (1780–1840) // Imagines mundi: Альманах исследований всеобщей истории XVI–XX вв., No 6. Екатеринбург 2008, c. 321–339]. [In Russian.] O’Loughlin Katrina. Women, Writing, and Travel in the Eighteenth Century, 2nd ed. Cambridge – New York – Melbourne 2020. The Cambridge History of Travel Writing / ed. Nandini Das and Tim Youngs. Cambridge 2019. The Routledge Companion to Travel Writing / ed. Carl Thompson. London 2016. Thompson Carl. The Nineteenth-Century Travel Writing // The Cambridge History of Travel Writing / ed. Nandini Das and Tim Youngs. Cambridge 2019, p. 108–124. Turner Katherine. British Women Travel Writers in Europe, 1750–1800: Authorship, Gender, and National Identity. Aldershot 2001. Voloshkova Nataliia. Bluestockings and Travel Accounts: Reading, Writing and Collecting. Cambridge 2021. Voloshkova Nataliia. On Terrains of the Other Empire: Mary Holderness’s Account of Her Residence in Early 19th-Century Crimea // British Women Travellers: Empire and Beyond, 1770–1870 / ed. Sutapa Dutta. New York and Abingdon 2020, p. 70–85. Youngs Tim. The Cambridge Introduction to Travel Writing, 2nd ed. Cambridge 2014.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it