MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404355867 · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2024.113576

Registration-based nonlinear model reduction of parametrized aerodynamics problems with applications to transonic Euler and RANS flows

2024· article· en· W4404355867 on OpenAlexafffund
Alireza Razavi, Masayuki Yano

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of OntarioUniversity of TorontoCanada Foundation for InnovationOntario Research Foundation
KeywordsTransonicAerodynamicsReynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equationsEuler's formulaNonlinear systemReduction (mathematics)Euler equationsComputational fluid dynamicsAerospace engineeringApplied mathematicsAirfoilComputer sciencePhysicsMechanicsMathematicsMathematical analysisEngineeringGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a registration-based nonlinear model-order reduction (MOR) method for partial differential equations (PDEs) with applications to transonic Euler and Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations in aerodynamics. These PDEs exhibit discontinuous features, namely shocks, whose location depends on problem configuration parameters, and the associated parametric solution manifold exhibits a slowly decaying Kolmogorov N -width. As a result, conventional linear MOR methods, which use linear reduced approximation spaces, do not yield accurate low-dimensional approximations. We present a registration-based nonlinear MOR method to overcome this challenge. Our formulation builds on the following key ingredients: (i) a geometrically transformable parametrized PDE discretization; (ii) localized spline-based parametrized transformations which warp the domain to align discontinuities; (iii) an efficient dilation-based shock sensor and metric to compute optimal transformation parameters; (iv) hyperreduction and online-efficient output-based error estimates; and (v) simultaneous transformation and adaptive finite element training. Compared to existing methods in the literature, our formulation is efficiently scalable to larger problems and is equipped with error estimates and hyperreduction. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the method on two-dimensional inviscid and turbulent flows modeled by the Euler and RANS equations, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computational PhysicsSame topicModel Reduction and Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207