MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404356776 · doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2024.11.008

Perioperative Outcomes in Congenital Heart Disease: A Review of Clinical Factors Associated With Prolonged Ventilation and Length of Stay in Four Common CHD Operations

2024· review· en· W4404356776 on OpenAlexaff
A. Rebecca L. Hamilton, Koichi Yuki, Francis Fynn‐Thompson, James A. DiNardo, Kirsten C. Odegard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
FundersWeill Cornell Department of Anesthesiology
KeywordsMedicinePerioperativeHeart diseaseIntensive care medicineVentilation (architecture)DiseaseCardiologySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Perioperative management strategies and outcomes for low-risk congenital heart disease (CHD) surgery vary between institutions. To date, no consensus exists on standardized management for pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This study seeks to benchmark the perioperative management of 4 common CHD lesions and explore clinical factors affecting postoperative outcomes. DESIGN: A retrospective review of CHD procedures performed between 2015 and 2020. SETTING: The study was conducted at a single academic tertiary pediatric hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All patients presenting for repair of ventricular septal defects (VSDs), complete atrioventricular canal defects, tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), and transposition of the great arteries (TGA) were reviewed. INTERVENTIONS: Demographic and clinical data were collected; clinical outcomes were defined as postoperative length of ventilation (LOV) and hospital length of stay, divided into reference and prolonged course groups analyzed for variables associated with differences in outcomes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We selected 931 patients for review. Prolonged length of ventilation and length of stay in all cohorts were associated with longer operative, cardiopulmonary bypass, and cross-clamp times; higher intraoperative requirements for inotropic support; more blood transfusions and higher opioid administration; lower pH preoperatively and higher lactic acid postoperatively. Worse outcomes were associated with younger age in VSD, older age in TGA, and lower weight in TOF and TGA. Worse outcomes were also associated with a higher preoperative hematocrit in VSD and TOF and elevated preoperative blood glucose in VSD and TGA. CONCLUSIONS: A better understanding of clinical factors affecting outcomes may facilitate streamlining perioperative management strategies for pediatric patients undergoing low-risk cardiac surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular AnesthesiaSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207