MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 4144487: Fully Ungated, Free-Breathing, 3-Dimentional T2* Mapping for Imaging Hemorrhagic Myocardial Infarction

2024· article· en· W4404359258 on OpenAlexaff
Xingmin Guan, Hsin‐Jung Yang, Jane Sykes, Nan Wang, Xinheng Zhang, Richard Tang, Anthony Christodoulou, Behzad Sharif, Debiao Li, Frank S. Prato, Rohan Dharmakumar

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsLawson Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyocardial infarctionCardiologyInternal medicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: T2* cardiac MRI (CMR) is the standard for detecting hemorrhagic myocardial infarction (MI). However, the conventional T2* CMR (2D breath-held, ECG-gated, multi-gradient-echo T2*) can suffer from limited spatial resolution and multiple motion artifacts. We developed a time-efficient, fully ungated, free breathing, 3D T2* mapping method for detecting and characterizing hemorrhagic MI (hMI). Methods: Our approach, developed using a low-rank tensor framework, was tested in a canine model with reperfused hMI. Animals (n=5) underwent CMR 3 days after reperfusion. Short-axis, conventional 2D and proposed 3D T2*-w images, and the corresponding LGE images were acquired in a 3T CMR system. T2* maps (8 echoes, 1.41-15.44 ms) were constructed using mono-exponential fitting. IMH extent was determined by measuring the weighted sum of the imaging slices with hypointense regions (based on ‘mean-2SD’ criterion) within the LGE positive territories. Image quality was assessed by two CMR experts using a Likert scale (1 – poor; and 5 - excellent). Results: Figure 1 shows representative conventional 2D, proposed 3D T2* images, along with LGE image for reference. T2* image scores were higher with the proposed than the conventional approach: 3.5 ± 0.5 (conventional) vs 3.8 ± 0.3 (proposed), p<0.05. IMH extent measured using the two approaches provided equivalent IMH extent (see Fig. 2) under stable imaging conditions. Conclusions: The proposed 3D T2* mapping can provide much needed improvement in image quality compared to conventional 2D T2* CMR for detection of hemorrhagic MI without the need for breath holding or cardiac gating, both of which are known problems in acute MI patients. Provided imaging conditions are favorable, we also found that the proposed and conventional methods yield equivalent estimates of IMH extent. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the benefits of the proposed approach in clinical setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→