MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 4140656: Educational Attainment Level and Risk of Mortality and Cardiopulmonary Outcomes in High-Risk Cardiovascular Disease Patients: The INVESTED Trial

2024· article· en· W4404363291 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mats Christian Højbjerg Lassen, Nicholas Howell, Brian Claggett, Tor Biering‐Sørensen, Orly Vardeny, Scott Solomon, Jacob A. Udell, Jacob Joseph, Sheila M. Hegde

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiseaseIntensive care medicineGerontologyEmergency medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Social determinants, such as educational attainment level (EAL), are indicators of socioeconomic status and have been shown to be inversely related with adverse health outcomes. However, the association between EAL and risk of cardio-pulmonary events in heart failure (HF) and myocardial infarction (MI) survivors has not been extensively investigated. Methods: In the INVESTED trial, 5260 patients from the US and Canada with recent HF or MI hospitalization were randomized 1:1 to high-dose trivalent or standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine from Sep 2016 to Jan 2019. We examined the association between EAL and risk of adverse clinical outcomes for each participant across all enrolling seasons using Cox models adjusted for treatment assignment and clinically relevant confounders and stratified by trial entry year. Participants were categorized by EAL (high school or less [HS], post-high school or trade [post-HS/T], and college or more [Col+]). Results: Of the 4,912 participants (mean age: 65.5 years, 28% females, 80% White, 39% with MI and 61% with HF hospitalization as qualifying event) with EAL information, 43% were in the HS group, 28% were in the post-HS/T group, and 29% were in the Col+ group. At baseline, those with higher EAL were more likely to be White or Asian, be married/with long-term partner, have higher left ventricular ejection fraction, have lower NYHA class, and less likely to have cardiovascular comorbidities and risk factors than those with lower EAL. During follow-up (median: 9 months [6-16]), 1,706 (35%) participants experienced the composite of all-cause death or cardiopulmonary hospitalization. Compared to HS, higher EAL was associated with a stepwise decrease in the risk of the composite outcome (post-HS/T: HR: 0.88 95%CI: [0.79-0.99]; Col+: HR: 0.71 95%CI: [0.63-0.81], overall p-value <0.001). A similar protective effect of higher EAL was observed for additional adverse clinical outcomes ( Figure ). Conclusion: High EAL is independently associated with a decreased risk of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with high-risk cardiovascular disease, highlighting the need to consider EAL in risk assessment and target additional resources towards those with low EAL to improve prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207