Abstract 4141165: Long-Term Contemporary Outcomes of the Ross Procedure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Current evidence supports the use of the Ross procedure (pulmonary autograft) in adults with aortic valve disease. Aims: To examine the ten-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes following the Ross procedure using a tailored approach. Methods: This prospective cohort included 455 consecutive adults (333 male [73.1%]) with a median age of 50.0 years (IQR, 40.0-57.0) undergoing a Ross procedure at a single center. Patients with aortic aneurysms (37.4%), previous cardiac surgery (15.2%) and active endocarditis (5.7%) were included. The predominant lesion was aortic stenosis (AS) in 379 patients (83.3%) and aortic insufficiency (AI) in 76 patients (16.7%). The study period ranged from February 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019. Primary endpoints were cumulative incidence of any, autograft, or homograft reintervention, and time-related valve function (AI grades 0-4). The secondary endpoint was ten-year survival among Ross patients compared with that in the age- and sex-matched Canadian population. Median clinical follow-up was 6.0 years (maximum 13 years). Follow-up was 90% complete for clinical and 87% complete for echo follow-up. Results: Operative mortality was 0.4% (n=2). Both patients were operated among the first 100 cases. At 10 years, cumulative incidence of any aortic and/or pulmonary reintervention was 5.0% (95% CI, 2.3-9.4%); autograft reintervention 1.5% (0.5-3.4%); and homograft reintervention 3.4% (1.9-5.7%). In patients with preoperative AS, cumulative incidence of autograft reintervention was 1.8% at 10 years (0.6-4.1%), versus 0% in patients with preoperative AI (p=0.6) ( Figure 1 ). At 10 years, cumulative incidence of AI grade >2 was 2.0% (0.9-4.2%), and did not differ between patients with preoperative AS or AI (p=0.9) ( Figure 1 ). Ten-year survival was 96.5% (95% CI, 94.7-98.7%), translating to a relative survival of 100% (99.4-100%) compared to the matched general population. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that using a tailored surgical approach and contemporary perioperative management strategies, the Ross procedure is associated with excellent long-term valve function and freedom from reintervention in an all-comer adult patient population. Moreover, it translates into restored late survival, mimicking the general population. These results further support the notion that, in reference centers, the Ross procedure should be considered in adults needing valve replacement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".