MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 4141117: Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes by blood pressure in the SELECT trial

2024· article· en· W4404363416 on OpenAlexaff
Subodh Verma, John Deanfield, Yaron Arbel, Bertrand Cariou, Ana Laura de Souza Almeida Matos, G. Kees Hovingh, Ole Kleist Jeppesen, Steven E. Kahn, Gustavs Latkovskis, Ildiko Lingvay, Michael Mæng, Vincent Maher, Oleksandr Parkhomenko, Neil Poulter, Philippe van de Borne, Peter Kure, A. Michael Lincoff

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSemaglutideBlood pressureCardiologyInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusType 2 diabetesEndocrinologyLiraglutide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Although glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists have been shown to reduce BP and major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE), little is known about whether the benefits of these therapies vary in individuals with hypertension (HT) or across the spectrum of BP categories. Research Question and Aim: To evaluate the effect of once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg vs placebo on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes by baseline BP categories in SELECT. Methods: SELECT was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial that included patients aged ≥45 years with preexisting CV disease and BMI ≥27 kg/m 2 without diabetes. Patients received once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo; the primary endpoint was time to first MACE analyzed with a Cox proportional hazards model with semaglutide and placebo as fixed factors according to baseline BP categories. Results: Among 17,604 randomized patients, 14,392 (82%) had a history of HT. Patients with history of HT were older and more likely female, with a higher BMI, lower eGFR, and higher UACR. A higher proportion presented with atrial fibrillation, obstructive sleep apnea, and heart failure NYHA class II/III, but fewer underwent coronary revascularization (Table). Patients with HT who received placebo had a higher incidence rate of MACE vs semaglutide (2.6 vs 2.1 per 100 patient-years, respectively). Semaglutide generally exhibited consistent benefits for CV outcomes regardless of history of HT or baseline BP categories (Figure). Compared with placebo, semaglutide significantly and consistently reduced systolic BP (SBP) across BP categories (normal, −2.9 [95% CI−4.0; −1.9]; elevated BP, −2.8 [−4.0; −1.6]; stage 1, −3.4: [−4.1; −2.6]; stage 2, −3.7 [− 4.4; −2.9]). Conclusions: HT is highly prevalent in people with overweight or obesity and atherosclerotic CV disease without diabetes and is associated with increased MACE. Semaglutide led to consistent reductions in MACE and lowered SBP irrespective of baseline BP category.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207