MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 4140424: Early Insights on Mavacamten Usage in Canada: A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Patient Support Program

2024· article· en· W4404363681 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andrew Crean, Patrick Garceau, Andrew Moeller, F. Brellier, Stéphanie Corriveau, Michael E. Ward

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMigraine and Headache Studies
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreSt. Paul's HospitalBristol-Myers Squibb (Canada)Dalhousie UniversityMontreal Heart InstituteUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRetrospective cohort studyFamily medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Mavacamten is a first-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor initially approved in the US for treating obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) under the FDA-mandated Risk Evaluation Mitigation Strategy (REMS). Subsequently, mavacamten was approved in Canada with less restrictions. A patient support program (PSP) was implemented, offering a unique opportunity to generate data on mavacamten utilization in the Canadian population. Aims: The objective of the study was to obtain real-world insights into the demographic and clinical characteristics, including dosing and treatment duration of patients treated with mavacamten for oHCM in Canada. Methods: This was an observational retrospective study of 683 adult patients with symptomatic oHCM enrolled in the Canadian mavacamten PSP between January 4, 2023 to April 12, 2024. Baseline demographic and clinical data were collected for age, gender, NYHA class, vLVOT gradient, LVEF and change in mavacamten dose. Results: The baseline clinical characteristics of the 683 patients are summarized in Table 1. Patients were distributed across several provinces with a median age of 65 years and a similar distribution between the male and female populations. The majority (N=458: 67.1%) were classified as NYHA class II. Nearly all patients were initiated at 5 mg of mavacamten as per the Canadian product monograph. Most (63.7%) of patients were on β-blockers alone (Table 1). The median follow-up time was 27.4 weeks (range 1.6-70.1). Notably, at the time of data cut off, 13.2% of patients were receiving mavacamten alone compared to 10.5% at initiation. The median treatment duration was 24.6 weeks, censored at data cut-off, with a discontinuation rate of 7.9%, primarily due to adverse events (2.5%) and lack of efficacy (0.9%). Conclusions: Mavacamten has been widely adopted across Canada with low discontinuation rates indicating good tolerability. The current risk management strategies in Canada are sufficient and obviate the need for a stricter approach. These early results provide the largest dataset on mavacamten utilization in the Canadian HCM population, adding to the accruing evidence of its safe and effective use in the real world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.148

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicMigraine and Headache Studies→French-language works237,207→