Real-world mepolizumab treatment in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis reduces disease burden in the United States
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a rare, chronic inflammatory disease characterized by asthma and small/medium vessel vasculitis. Mepolizumab is approved for use in EGPA disease management alongside oral corticosteroids (OCS), but evidence of its real-world impact is limited. OBJECTIVE: To compare real-world treatment patterns and health outcomes, particularly OCS use, EGPA-related hospitalizations/relapses, and asthma exacerbations pre- and post-mepolizumab initiation in US patients with EGPA. METHODS: Patients with EGPA receiving more than or equal to 2 mepolizumab doses were identified using administrative claims data from Komodo Health's Comprehensive Dataset (between December 2016-March 2020). Outcomes assessed pre- and post-mepolizumab initiation included corticosteroid/other medication use, EGPA-related hospitalizations/relapses, and asthma exacerbations. RESULTS: Overall, 114 patients were identified; of these, 60 (53%) received mepolizumab 300 mg at index. Average daily OCS dose per dispensing was significantly lower post- vs pre-mepolizumab initiation (21.2 vs 26.8 mg/d, 21% relative reduction, P < .001); mean number of OCS bursts also decreased (0.9 vs 1.8, 50% relative reduction, P < .001). Patients experienced significantly lower rates of EGPA-related hospitalization (0.86 vs 1.55 per-person year [PPY], 49% relative reduction, P = .004) and EGPA relapse (3.18 vs 3.94 PPY, 19% relative reduction, P = .004) post- vs pre-initiation. Most patients (91%) had an asthma diagnosis at baseline; among these patients, asthma exacerbation rates were significantly lower post- vs pre-initiation (1.05 vs 1.84 PPY, 42% relative reduction, P = .004). CONCLUSION: Mepolizumab was associated with significant steroid-sparing benefits and significantly reduced rates of EGPA-related hospitalizations, EGPA relapses, and asthma exacerbations in this real-world study of US patients with EGPA, confirming the benefits of mepolizumab treatment seen in clinical trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".