MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404370907 · doi:10.1109/twc.2024.3483658

Dependency-Aware Joint Task Offloading and Resource Allocation in Heterogeneous Mobile Edge Computing

2024· article· en· W4404370907 on OpenAlexafffund
Guo Zhang, Baoxian Zhang, Shuo Peng, Cheng Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersSimon Fraser UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceMobile edge computingResource allocationJoint (building)Resource management (computing)Task (project management)Mobile computingEdge computingDistributed computingDependency (UML)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionMobile telephonyWirelessComputer networkServerMobile radioArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile edge computing (MEC) is a promising computing paradigm and can effectively reduce the energy consumption and computing costs at mobile devices by offloading computation-intensive and latency-sensitive applications/tasks to edge servers. However, how to achieve cost-effective dependent task offloading and resource allocation subject to application completion time constraint and service configuration constraint at edge side in heterogeneous MEC environments remains a challenge. To address this challenge, in this paper, we study the multi-application dependent task offloading and resource allocation problem in heterogeneous MEC environments for jointly minimizing the energy consumption and computing cost. We first formulate this problem as a mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problem. We propose a two-stage alternating optimization algorithm. In the first stage, a genetic-based algorithm is proposed to determine an optimized task offloading profile for given transmit power matrix, a look ahead based task scheduling algorithm is designed to obtain an optimized task schedule for the profile. In the second stage, the transmit power allocation problem for a given offloading profile is solved using convex optimization techniques. Extensive simulation results show that the proposed algorithm can effectively reduce the total cost of task executions as compared with baseline algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207