MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 4146349: Coronary atheroma burden and structural vascular dysfunction in women with suspected ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease.

2024· article· en· W4404382189 on OpenAlexaff
Sachini Ranasinghe, Amélie Paquin, Yujie Cui, Jenna Maughan, G.B. John Mancini, Michael D. Nelson, Carl J. Pepine, Janet Wei, C. Noel Bairey Merz

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtheromaCardiologyCoronary artery diseaseInternal medicineIschemiaDiseaseVascular diseaseCoronary atherosclerosisEndothelial dysfunction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Different mechanisms have been proposed to explain abnormal coronary flow reserve (CFR), with authors describing structural vs functional endotypes of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Epicardial coronary atheroma burden (AB) index is a marker of vascular remodeling confirmed by intravascular ultrasound and is estimated by the measurement of coronary artery tapering. Atheroma burden index is inversely related to CFR in women with suspected ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA). We hypothesized that AB could help better understand the pathophysiology of these CMD endotypes. Purpose: To evaluate the association between epicardial AB, baseline average peak velocity (APV), and resting coronary blood flow (CBF) to better understand endotypes (structural vs functional) of vascular dysfunction. Methods: Women with suspected INOCA (n=180) enrolled in two prospective cohort studies (NCT02582021, NCT03876223) who underwent clinically indicated invasive coronary function testing with a Doppler wire measuring CFR, baseline APV and resting CBF, were included in this analysis. Epicardial AB was measured by core laboratory and was derived for the left main and anterior descending coronary segments. The association of AB with CBF and APV was assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Results: Mean age was 55±10 years, body mass index 27.5±5.9 kg/m 2 , 33% had hypertension, 12% diabetes, 18% dyslipidemia and 27% were former smokers. Mean average AB was 1.33±0.37, mean maximal AB was 2.02±0.54 and mean CFR was 3.23±2.35. Both average and maximal AB negatively correlated with resting CBF (r=-0.23, p=0.005; and r=-0.20, p=0.015, respectively) and positively correlated with baseline APV (r=0.23, p=0.002; and r=0.18, p=0.015, respectively). (Figure) Conclusions: These results suggest that the findings of a low resting CBF and high baseline APV, among women with suspected INOCA, is associated with a higher epicardial coronary AB. The use of baseline APV and resting CBF could help identify those who are affected by a structural endotype of coronary vascular dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityFrench-language works237,207