MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404397537 · doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2024.101810

Molecular docking and in silico analysis of the pharmacokinetics, toxicological profile and differential gene expression of bioactive compounds from Cyrtopodium glutiniferum

2024· article· en· W4404397537 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueToxicology Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsIn silicoComputational biologyChemistryPharmacokineticsPharmacologyGeneBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The genus Cyrtopodium , from the Orchidaceae family, is widely used for its therapeutic properties in the treatment of tuberculosis, abscesses, urinary infection, and colds. C. glutiniferum , one of the species of this genus, is endemic in Brazil and largely used in herbal medicine. Thus, it is of great interest to recognize its composition, the properties of the molecules found in it. This study aimed to perform the in silico analysis of the main compounds from C. glutiniferum , on the platforms pKCSM, SwissADME, LAZAR, CLC-pred, ToxTree, DIGEPred, STRING, and Cytoscape. Further than this, the molecular docking was performed. The compounds present in the aqueous extract of C. glutiniferum were identified by UHPLC-MS/MS, finding Arbutin, Caffeic acid 4-O-glucoside, and Dihydroformononetin as the three most abundant molecules. The evaluation of the gastrointestinal absorption of Dihydroformononetin is given as high, also managing to cross the blood-brain barrier, while Arbutin can only be absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract and Caffeic acid 4-O-glucoside had very low absorption. Further analysis showed that Arbutin and Dihydroformononetin are possible leading molecules for drug synthesis, according to the prediction. Toxicological aspects were analysed, and no adverse effects were noted, but there were divergences in the mutagenic prediction of Arbutin and Dihydroformononetin, having different results in the used platforms, demonstrating that a cautious analysis and data insertion is needed in these tools to optimize them. The analysis of the differentially expressed genes predicted that the compounds can regulate several genes, including some genes associated with carcinogenesis and inflammation. The Molecular docking analysis showed high binding affinities of the molecules with different proteins. Therefore, C. glutiniferum demonstrates the potential to be used as a phytotherapeutic. The same was given through the in silico analysis of the three compounds found in the orchid, that show good individual potential. • The analysis shows potential of compounds as anti-inflammatory and anticancer agents. • Molecular docking shows strong binding affinities with target proteins. • Arbutin and Caffeic Acid 4-O-glucoside may exhibit synergistic therapeutic effects. • Dihydroformononetin downregulates proinflammatory genes. • Dihydroformononetin upregulates AURKB and AURKA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.501
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it