MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404410551 · doi:10.1002/mp.17518

Design, manufacturing, and multi‐modal imaging of stereolithography 3D printed flexible intracranial aneurysm phantoms

2024· article· en· W4404410551 on OpenAlexafffund
Alain Yalman, Arman Jafari, Étienne Léger, M Mastroianni, Kowsar Teimouri, Houman Savoji, D. Louis Collins, Lyes Kadem, Yiming Xiao

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnatomy and Medical Technology
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineUniversité de MontréalConcordia University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsStereolithographyMedical imagingModal3d printedMedical physicsBiomedical engineeringComputer scienceRadiologyMaterials scienceMedicineEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Physical vascular phantoms are instrumental in studying intracranial aneurysms and testing relevant imaging tools and training systems to provide improved clinical care. Current vascular phantom production methods have major limitations in capturing the biophysical and morphological characteristics of intracranial aneurysms with good fidelity and multi-modal imaging capacity. With stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing technology becoming more accessible, newer flexible and transparent printing materials with higher precision controls open the door for improving the efficiency and quality of producing anthropomorphic vascular phantoms but have rarely been explored for the application. PURPOSE: This technical note intends to report the feasibility of using SLA 3D printing technology to manufacture flexible intracranial aneurysm phantoms with similar scales to the real anatomy, as well as their capacity for multi-modal flow imaging and analysis, including ultrasound flow imaging, high-speed filming, and particle image velocimetry analysis. METHODS: We designed and 3D-printed two intracranial aneurysm phantoms with an SLA 3D printer using Formlabs Elastic 50A resin. By using a micropump to introduce cyclical flows in the phantoms, we first employed conventional Doppler and vector flow ultrasonography to observe and measure different fluidic properties. Then, a high-speed camera was used to record particles flowing within the phantom, and we further conducted a particle image velocimetry analysis, including the distribution of mean 2D velocity vectors, average velocity magnitudes, and the mean vorticity fields in the phantom for the high-speed imaging data. RESULTS: We successfully 3D-printed flexible intracranial aneurysm phantoms with similar dimensions to the real anatomy. Additionally, we validated the phantoms' ability to allow visualization, measurement, and analysis of flow dynamics based on both real-time ultrasound and optical imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Our proof-of-concept study illustrates that SLA 3D printing using commercial elastic resins can significantly contribute towards facilitating the fabrication of flexible intracranial aneurysms phantoms for training, research, and preoperative planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicAnatomy and Medical TechnologyFrench-language works237,207