MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404416401 · doi:10.14740/jnr830

Demographics and Clinical Correlates of Blood Pressure Among Ugandans at Risk for Stroke

2024· article· en· W4404416401 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Martha Sajatovic, Martin N. Kaddumukasa, Josephine Nambi Najjuma, Scovia Nalugo Mbalinda, Jane Nakibuuka, Doreen Birungi, Carla Conroy, Joy Yala, Levicatus Mugenyi, Christopher J. Burant, Shirley M. Moore, Elly Katabira, Mark Kaddumukasa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicineDemographicsBlood pressureStroke (engine)Stroke riskInternal medicineEmergency medicineDemographyIschemic stroke

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Stroke risk factors are an emerging public health problem in Sub-Saharan Africa. This analysis examined demographic and clinical correlates of blood pressure (BP) in a Ugandan sample at risk for stroke. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of demographics, stroke risk factors, and selected clinical variables associated with systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Demographics (age, gender, marital status, education level, rural/suburban/urban status, and employment status), stroke risk factors (diabetes, hyperlipidemia, obesity, smoking status, sedentary lifestyle, and problem alcohol use), and clinical variables associated with SBP and DBP were derived from the screening and baseline sample of a prospective, randomized effectiveness-implementation trial testing a novel stroke risk reduction approach (TargetEd manAgeMent Intervention (TEAM)) conducted across three Ugandan sites. We examined variables with respect to an established set of guidelines for hypertension (HTN) severity, the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension (ESC-ESH) Guideline. Results: Of the total sample of 247, the mean sample age was 55.4 years (standard deviation (SD) = 12.0), with a female predominance (n = 168, 68%). In addition to HTN, the most common sample stroke risk factors were hyperlipidemia (n = 199, 80.6%) and obesity (n = 98, 39.7%). The majority (n = 238, 96.4%) were prescribed at least one medication to treat HTN. Mean SBP and DBP at baseline were 143.0 (SD = 19.8, range 94.5 - 206) and 89.3 (SD = 14.0, range 61 - 136), respectively. ESC-ESH classifications were grouped into grades of increasing severity from the mildest (grade 1) to the most severe (grade 3). An additional < grade 1 was created to reflect individuals whose ESC-ESH scores dropped below grade 1 post-screening. There were few significant differences across ESC-ESH groups, except that having diabetes, being sedentary, and being a smoker were associated with higher ESC-ESH grades. Conclusions: To help reduce the stroke burden in Uganda, our findings support the importance of raising awareness of HTN and helping individuals to manage their HTN with both medications and lifestyle approaches. J Neurol Res. 2024;14(2):74-85 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jnr830

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology Research→Same topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies→French-language works237,207→