MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404430952 · doi:10.1002/adfm.202420622

3D Bimetallic Platinum‐Nickel Electrodes for Electro‐Oxidation of Glycerol at Ambient Conditions

2024· article· en· W4404430952 on OpenAlexafffund
Shayan Angizi, Mahdis Nankali, Amir Foroozan, Jihyeon Park, Ecem Yelekli Kirici, Navid Noor, Michael Fefer, Yuichi Terazono, Drew Higgins

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Functional Materials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsMcMaster University
KeywordsBimetallic stripMaterials sciencePlatinumNickelElectrodeGlycerolChemical engineeringElectrochemistryInorganic chemistryMetallurgyCatalysisOrganic chemistryMetalPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Partial electro‐oxidation using renewable electricity offers a sustainable route for valorizing glycerol, a major by‐product of biofuel production. This study introduces a bimetallic electrode with nanostructured platinum dendrites on nickel foam (Pt/NiF), achieving a peak geometric current density of 235 mA cm−2 and a Pt‐mass normalized current density of 3.71 for glycerol electro‐oxidation at 0.92 V versus a reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) in 3 m KOH electrolyte containing 1 m glycerol, outperforming most previously reported Pt‐containing catalysts. The Pt/NiF electrode demonstrates over 92% cumulative selectivity toward C3 products, with 64% selectivity for lactic acid at 0.65 V versus RHE over 5 h of testing. This research also highlights the role of chemical oxidation pathways (isomerization and rearrangements) in converting glycerol to lactic acid. After 5 h at 0.65 V versus RHE, the Pt/NiF electrode maintains 35% of its initial current density, plateauing at 12.2 mA cm−2 (0.15 ), with performance loss likely due to surface poisoning by carbon‐based reaction intermediates/byproducts or passivating platinum (hydr)oxide species. These findings pave the way for developing low‐platinum group metal catalysts with high glycerol oxidation affinity and highlight the importance of considering chemical transformations during catalyst evaluation and reactor design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Functional MaterialsSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207