MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404446097 · doi:10.24908/pocus.v9i2.17449

Correlation of Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Guided Pupillary Assessment Parameter with Glasgow Coma Scale in Patients with Altered Mental Status– A Cross Sectional Study

2024· article· en· W4404446097 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Priyanka Modi, Sanjeev Bhoi

Bibliographic record

VenuePOCUS Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlasgow Coma ScaleMedicinePupillary light reflexRank correlationPupillary reflexCross-sectional studyComa (optics)PupilReceiver operating characteristicProspective cohort studyInternal medicineSurgeryReflexPsychologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Earlier studies have proved deteriorating Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) as a marker of raised intracranial pressure (ICP). Low GCS is associated with abnormal pupillary parameters. Currently, many studies have proved that ultrasound provides a feasible and objective assessment of pupillary light reflex. However, literature is lacking to evaluate objective pupillary parameters to predict GCS of the patients by point of care ultrasound (POCUS). Materials and methods: In this prospective, cross-sectional study, 200 patients were recruited in the emergency department. The inclusion criteria were patients older than 18 years with acute presentation of altered mental status. Exclusion criteria were patients who had partial globe rupture or dementia. The patients underwent a B-mode POCUS-guided evaluation at rest and after light stimulation. Statistical analysis of relationship between pupillary assessment parameters and GCS was performed using Spearman's Rank correlation coefficient, Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test, and area under the receiver operating characteristic. Results: The study consisted of 200 (42 female, 158 male) patients with mean (± standard deviation) of age and GCS of 43.56 ± 16.50 years and 5.54 ± 3.00, respectively. Majority of non-reactive pupils had a GCS Score of 3-8 (74 cases, 97.37%). The Pupillary diameter (PD) and PD variation showed statistically significant agreement with pupil reactivity to light stimulation and GCS, with Spearman's correlation coefficient ranging from 0.28 to 0.33 for PD, and -0.55 to -0.50 (p-value <0.05) for PD variation, respectively. PD variation rate (PDVR) is the percentage change in the magnitude of constriction of PD on light stimulation. PDVR of >19.68% had a sensitivity of 86.96% (95% CI: 82.04 - 91.88%) and specificity of 64.97% (95% CI: 58.00 - 71.94%) to detect GCS>8. Conclusion: PD variation and PDVR measured by POCUS has significant correlation with GCS >8. The study showed good sensitivity and low specificity of PDVR on light stimulation to detect GCS >8.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePOCUS JournalSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesFrench-language works237,207