MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404448248 · doi:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230438r1

Current and Future Challenges to Publishing Family Medicine Research

2024· article· en· W4404448248 on OpenAlexaff
Dean A. Seehusen, Sarina Schrager, Sumi M. Sexton

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth and Medical Research Impacts
Canadian institutionsCollege of Family Physicians of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingEngineering ethicsPolitical scienceLibrary scienceMedicineData scienceComputer scienceEngineeringLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The specialty of family medicine is currently pushing for a future with more and better family medicine research. If successful, there will be much more family medicine literature to be published. Family medicine as a specialty has multiple high-quality journals covering research, clinical care,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.416
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.677
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.4160.677
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0220.027
Science and technology studies0.0150.016
Scholarly communication0.0710.057
Open science0.0150.018
Research integrity0.0250.023
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.368
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the American Board of Family MedicineSame topicHealth and Medical Research ImpactsFrench-language works237,207