Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article aims to reconstruct the history of civil society in Quebec (Canada) to\nrelate it with nationalism, the rise of the welfare state, trade unions, Catholic Church and\ncivil society, the dynamic forces of society. Through in-depth interviews with key leaders,\nexploration of institutional archives and specific literature, we work with a particular case\nthat, when compared to Catalonia, will allow us to evaluate the importance of civil society\nwithin nationalism. This actor is not usually considered as the central subject of researches\nand rarely token into account, unlike political parties, their leaders or intellectuals. Currently,\nin a context of crisis of the state and political parties, it has begun to be considered\nthat civil society can be a key factor for its ability to produce alliances between sectors, build\nhegemony and dialogue directly with the population. The study is divided into four parts:\n1) the development of the theoretical framework along with the construction of the object\nof study and the hypotheses; 2) an analysis about the importance of the involvement of civil\nsociety in the construction of the nationalist movement in Quebec; 3) a comparison with\nthe Catalan case; and, 4) finally some conclusions
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".