Factors influencing women’s participation in disaster recovery after the 2005 earthquake in Kashmir, Pakistan
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to examine factors that influenced the participation of women in the disaster recovery process after October, 2005 earthquake in the Union Council Langarpura, Azad Kashmir state of Pakistan. To achieve this aim, two focus group discussions, thirty-four (34) semi-structured interviews and participant observations were conducted. The results revealed that women’s participation was influenced by two key factors: the role of social capital and the Kashmir earthquake itself. Three forms of social capital including bonding, bridging and linking social capital encouraged women in Langarpura to participate in the recovery. The Kashmir earthquake influenced women’s participation in disaster recovery due to the death of the men heads of the family and the outmigration of men that compelled women to start working by participating in various recovery projects. The influx of several government and nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) as well as aid organisations after the Kashmir earthquake also encouraged women’s participation in disaster recovery. The findings of this study show that the Kashmir earthquake opened a window of opportunity to change the status of the women of Langarpura and their stereotypical roles in society and go out and take an active part in the recovery of their families and the community at large.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it