Abstract C005: Tumor vaccines and oncolytic virotherapy: systemic immunity vs. tumor microenvironment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Tumor vaccines, particularly the innovative mRNA variants, hold immense promise in cancer immunotherapy. Despite their potential, these vaccines encounter formidable challenges in surmounting immune tolerance, the immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and more importantly, the resistance developed in cancer cells that are antigen negative. Concurrently, oncolytic virotherapy (OV), a distinct facet of tumor vaccination, significantly alters the TME and releases tumor antigens via lysis to generate a broader spectrum of tumor antigens. This unique property positions OV to induce anti-tumor immunity, as evidenced by prolonged overall survival and abscopal tumor suppression. Recognizing the complementary strengths of mRNA tumor vaccines and OV, we propose a combined approach to address the limitations inherent in each modality. Our study tested this hypothesis by combining a mRNA vaccine targeting HER2 with oncolytic viruses, utilizing a prime-boost strategy on a HER2-expressing CT26 mouse tumor model. Notably, while the mRNA vaccine alone induced specific anti-HER2 systemic immunity, the combination demonstrated a potent immune response against both anti-HER2 and anti-CT26, leading to durable tumor eradication. Our findings highlight that peripheral vaccination has the potential to elicit an immune response in non-immune suppressive environments. However, combining it with virotherapy not only amplifies specific immunity but also induces a broader immune response against a spectrum of tumor antigens. This synergistic combination represents a promising avenue for advancing cancer immunotherapy, offering the potential for improved treatment outcomes and broader applicability of tumor vaccines across diverse cancer types. Citation Format: William Jia. Tumor vaccines and oncolytic virotherapy: systemic immunity vs. tumor microenvironment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Tumor-body Interactions: The Roles of Micro- and Macroenvironment in Cancer; 2024 Nov 17-20; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(22_Suppl):Abstract nr C005.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".