MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404471591

Zirconium impact on freshwater periphytic communities

2018· preprint· en· W4404471591 on OpenAlexaff
Caroline Doose, Soizic Morin, Jacky Vedrenne, Claude Fortin

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZirconiumEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceMetallurgy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing world demand for metals is leading to a consequent increase of metallic element mobilization in aquatic systems. Although the effect of metals on freshwater ecosystems is well documented, studies on the impacts of tetravalent metals are very scarce. Zirconium (Zr) is a tetravalent non-radioactive element for which the global demand has been increasing steadily in the last decades. Benthic microorganism communities (periphyton) have shown good potential as a biomonitoring tool to assess metal exposure of aquatic organisms. In this work, the effect of Zr on periphyton biodiversity and biochemistry was investigated to apply this tool to zirconium and other tetravalent metals contamination assessment and to better understand their potential impacts on aquatic ecosystems. Glass slides were immerged in a pond in Cestas (near Bordeaux, France) for one month to be colonised by periphyton. They were distributed in 3 aquaria containing a synthetic culture medium (Dauta, 1982) and effective concentrations of 0.2 ± 0.1 nM (C0), 0.5 ± 0.3 nM (C1) or 2.9 ± 0.3 nM (C2) of Zr (n=3). One slide per section was sampled after 1, 2 and 4 weeks of exposure for subsequent analyses: dry weight, chlorophyll pigments fluorescence, photosynthetic activity, microscopic microorganism identification, polysaccharide and protein contents. Biomass, proteins, polysaccharides and diatoms abundance increased significantly showing the growth of the biofilm during the experiment. No significant Zr exposure effects were observed on biomass, proteins, polysaccharides contents but their productions appeared to be slightly lower in C1 and C2 at t2 and t4. Diatoms growth rate in the C2 condition was significantly lower than in C0 and C1. Results obtained by pigments fluorescence measurements showed significant cyanobacteria decrease in the C2 condition over the exposure time as well as the brown algae between t2 and t4. Principal response curve (PRC) analysis showed significant changes over time of micromeiofauna composition between the reference (C0) and the C2 condition. Ciliates were less impacted by Zr exposure than flagellates which tended to disappear in the C2 condition. Biofilm microorganisms play a wide role in major ecosystem processes. Regarding these results, Zr exposure can impact the periphyton microorganisms composition which could disturb periphyton key functions. A better understanding of effects of metals on micromeiofauna would improve risk assessment of metallic exposure in aquatic ecosystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Same topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior→French-language works237,207→