Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the child and youth resilience measure—revised (PMK-CYRM-R) among Iranian children
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the revised version of the Child and Youth Resilience Measure – Person Most Knowledgeable (PMK-CYRM-R) questionnaire among Iranian children. Participants included a community sample of 435 Iranian children (M-age = 6.92 years; SD = 2.94; 52.2% boys) who participated in this study with their mothers (M-age = 36.67 years; SD = 5.65). All participants completed the Persian translation of the PMK-CYRM-R and measures of the Emotion Regulation Checklist and the Child Behavior Checklist. Confirmatory Factor Analysis supports the 2-factor structure of the scale and was invariant across genders and age groups. In examining internal consistency using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald's omega, the value of each subscale and the total scale was higher than 0.7. Regarding concurrent validity, the PMK-CYRM-RTotal score and its subscales share a positive correlation with healthy and adaptive variables, such as emotion regulation and a negative correlation with maladaptive and pathological variables. The present results, the first to examine the psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Persian version of the PMK-CYRM-R, provide support for the validity and reliability of the PMK-CYRM-R to assess children's resilience through their caregivers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it