A Combinatorial Functional Precision Medicine Platform for Rapid Therapeutic Response Prediction in <scp>AML</scp>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite advances made in targeted biomarker-based therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment, remission is often short and followed by relapse and acquired resistance. Functional precision medicine (FPM) efforts have been shown to improve therapy selection guidance by incorporating comprehensive biological data to tailor individual treatment. However, effectively managing complex biological data, while also ensuring rapid conversion of actionable insights into clinical utility remains challenging. METHODS: We have evaluated the clinical applicability of quadratic phenotypic optimization platform (QPOP), to predict clinical response to combination therapies in AML and reveal patient-centric insights into combination therapy sensitivities. In this prospective study, 51 primary samples from newly diagnosed (ND) or refractory/relapsed (R/R) AML patients were evaluated by QPOP following ex vivo drug testing. RESULTS: Individualized drug sensitivity reports were generated in 55/63 (87.3%) patient samples with a median turnaround time of 5 (4-10) days from sample collection to report generation. To evaluate clinical feasibility, QPOP-predicted response was compared to clinical treatment outcomes and indicated concordant results with 83.3% sensitivity and 90.9% specificity and an overall 86.2% accuracy. Serial QPOP analysis in a FLT3-mutant patient sample indicated decreased FLT3 inhibitor (FLT3i) sensitivity, which is concordant with increasing FLT3 allelic burden and drug resistance development. Forkhead box M1 (FOXM1)-AKT signaling was subsequently identified to contribute to resistance to FLT3i. CONCLUSION: Overall, this study demonstrates the feasibility of applying QPOP as a functional combinatorial precision medicine platform to predict therapeutic sensitivities in AML and provides the basis for prospective clinical trials evaluating ex vivo-guided combination therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".