MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404505238 · doi:10.1144/m61-2024-54

Chapter 4. Evidence of working petroleum play systems: oil seeps and slicks

2024· article· en· W4404505238 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher J. Nicholas

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Memoirs · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRacing slickGeologyPetroleumPetroleum systemPetroleum explorationPetroleum engineeringOceanographyPaleontologySource rockOil spill

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maturation and accumulation of economic quantities of hydrocarbons are a common sedimentary component of continental rift basins around the world, both ancient and modern. Thus, groundwater is not the only fluid that may migrate along major rift faults away from basinal depocentres. De-risking petroleum exploration in rift basins requires demonstrating the presence of working petroleum play systems, and the presence of leaking hydrocarbons to the surface is a primary way of demonstrating they are operating. Oil seeps have been known in Lake Albert since 1925 and the Kingfisher, Mputa–Waraga and Jobi–Rii petroleum play systems are due to go into full oil production. Lake Edward, however, has remained a virgin frontier exploration area. Tufa–travertine limestones along the eastern rift-bounding fault of the Rwenzori Mountains have yielded organic residues which gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analyses indicate have a mature, oil-like distribution. Biomarkers suggest a marine shale source rock, the origin of which is at odds with both oils from Lake Albert and generation within the present East African Rift System. A Lake Edward Slick Survey also sampled oil on the water surface that has the same biomarker signatures as the tufa–travertine-derived residues. Together they suggest maturation from a deeper pre-Neogene (?Mesozoic–Paleogene) rift sequence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London MemoirsSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207