Metasurface-Inspired Circularly Polarized MIMO Antenna for 5G mmWave Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This letter offers metasurface-inspired multiple-input--multiple-output (MIMO) antenna with circular polarization (CP). The antenna radiating element consists of 1 × 2 array nonbianisotropic split ring resonator with an interdigital capacitance. Furthermore, a four-port MIMO antenna is designed with a 8 × 8 metasurface array (M-Array) on the ground plane. The dimensions of the proposed CP MIMO antenna are 4.6<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\lambda _{0}$</tex-math></inline-formula><inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\, \times\, \text{4.6}\lambda _{0}$</tex-math></inline-formula><inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\,\times\, \text{0.128}\lambda _{0}$</tex-math></inline-formula> at 28 GHz. The MIMO antenna with an M-Array offers a frequency range of 30.15% [(23.8 to 32.25) GHz], isolation above 55 dB and an overlapping 3 dB axial ratio bandwidth of 14% from 26.5 GHz to 30.5 GHz with a high gain of 18.5 dBi. The proposed MIMO antenna is simplified into an equivalent circuit model. Diversity metrics ensures good diversity performance including, envelope correlation coefficient (ECC <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$< $</tex-math></inline-formula> 0.01), diversity gain (DG <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\approx$</tex-math></inline-formula> 10 dB), channel capacity loss (CCL <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$< $</tex-math></inline-formula> 0.1 bits/Hz), and total active reflection coefficient (TARC <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$< $</tex-math></inline-formula> –10 dB). The proposed MIMO antenna's operational range includes the mmWave band [(25 to 29.5) GHz]. It is well suited for 5G new radio smart devices due to its better performance and compatibility with 5G communication standards.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".