MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404522113 · doi:10.1186/s13148-024-01779-8

Associations of epigenetic age acceleration at birth and age 12 years with adolescent cardiometabolic risk: the HOME study

2024· article· en· W4404522113 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Arzu, Karl T. Kelsey, George D. Papandonatos, Kim M. Cecil, Aimin Chen, Scott M. Langevin, Bruce P. Lanphear, Kimberly Yolton, Jessie P. Buckley, Joseph M. Braun

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Epigenetics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicineEpigeneticsOffspringConfoundingProspective cohort studyCohortGestational ageCohort studyInternal medicinePregnancyPhysiologyBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cardiometabolic risk factors among youth are rising. Epigenetic age acceleration, a biomarker for aging and disease-risk, has been associated with adiposity in children, but its association with other cardiometabolic risk markers remains understudied. We employed data from the Health Outcomes and Measures of the Environment (HOME) study, a prospective pregnancy and birth cohort in the greater Cincinnati metropolitan area, to examine whether accelerated epigenetic age at birth as well as accelerated epigenetic age and faster pace of biological aging at age 12 years were associated with higher cardiometabolic risk in adolescents. RESULTS: After adjusting for potential confounders, including estimated cell type proportions, epigenetic gestational age acceleration at birth, derived from the Bohlin, Knight, and Haftorn clocks using cord blood DNA methylation data, was not associated with cardiometabolic risk z-scores or individual cardiometabolic risk score components (visceral fat, leptin to adiponectin ratio, HOMA-IR, triglycerides to HDL-C ratio, HbA1c, or systolic blood pressure) at age 12 years. We also did not observe any associations of epigenetic age acceleration, calculated with Horvath's skin and blood, Hannum's, and Wu's epigenetic clocks using peripheral blood at age 12 years, with these same cardiometabolic risk markers. In contrast, faster pace of biological aging was associated with higher cardiometabolic risk [βs (95% CIs)] cardiometabolic risk score 0.25 (0.07, 0.42); visceral fat 0.21 (0.05, 0.38); and hemoglobin A1c 0.23 (0.05, 0.41) per standard deviation increase in pace of biological aging. Faster pace of biological aging was also positively associated with systolic blood pressure, triglycerides to HDL-C ratio, HOMA-IR, and leptin to adiponectin ratio, although these associations were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide evidence that faster pace of biological aging was associated with higher cardiometabolic risk score, visceral fat, and HbA1c at age 12 years. Further research is needed to determine whether these associations persist from adolescence through adulthood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical EpigeneticsSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207